Posted by Melissa Harris-Lacewell
Sarah Palin announced her unblinking decision to run for the VP slot, but had to declare a media blackout while she packed her son for Iraq. So much for her multi-tasking super mom status.
Now, John McCain cannot simultaneously run for President and serve his country as a US Senator. He can't formulate policy about the current crisis and talk about that policy in a televised forum. When would he get a nap?
I think I understand the political strategy here. McCain is pitching himself as the "Country First" candidate. He figures that he can display himself as a serious statesman buckling down to find answers to our tough problems while Obama selfishly pursues election and demands additional forums to make lofty speeches. It ain't a bad strategy and it renews my faith (fear?) in the GOP election-spinning machine. But, I believe that this strategy is just spin and not substance.
The policy effort on the economic bailout has enjoyed broad bi-partisan support in the Congress. I am not saying the policy is good policy, only that there is not some emerging political crisis that must be averted by bringing the ol' Maverick to the table. Further, there is no reason that a DC vote midday on Friday should deter a Friday night debate in Mississippi. Air travel has made it possible to be in multiple cities in a single day. Also staffers do much of the hard work in these moments and elected officials mostly show up to be counted and make speeches (which the staffers write). With email and telephones senators can oversee a great deal of legislative work and communicate with their colleagues while not in town. I am not suggesting that senators never have to go to work, only that running for office while holding office is not exactly a novel experience for politicians.
If McCain is not selflessly putting country first, what is his motivation for delaying the debate? It could be the pro-Obama drift in the national polls that worries him. This could give Obama an edge in the all important post-debate spin on the major networks Friday night. It could be his desire not to show up as the candidate of the incumbent party when Wall Street is looking like the Great Depression. Generally the Party in power loses when the economy is bad. (Remember Bill Clinton: "It's the Economy Stupid?") It could be just a simple assumption that it is always better to delay the moment when you have to be old and short standing next to Barack Obama. Maybe he just wants to disrupt all those well planned debate watching parties organized by Obama-ites in the swing states.
Whatever the reasons, I believe we must proceed with the debate. The presidency is the ultimate multi-tasking job. There will always be short term crises and long terms issues that must be simultaneously addressed. I have just had a 14 hour day of interruptions, delays, balancing disparate tasks, and making tough choices. Surely I can expect my president to work at least as hard as me.
Democracy cannot be delayed until everything is settled. Democracy is the messy and inconvenient process of self-governance. We the people deserve to see our candidates in a head-to-head comparison on the tough issues of the day, even if the day itself is a tough one.
What do you think? Delay or Debate?