Lunch & Learn: High Performance Computing: the Princeton Experience with Curt Hillegas, Bill Tang, Jim Stone, and Mikko Haataja

torus.jpgAt OIT’s Lunch ‘n Learn pre­sen­ta­tion on Octo­ber 11, three of the fac­ulty who were instru­men­tal in archi­tect­ing the new high per­for­mance facil­ity – Bill Tang (Chief Sci­en­tist at PPPL and Asso­ciate Direc­tor of PIC­SciE), Jim Stone (Astro­phys­i­cal Sci­ences with a joint appoint­ment in PACM), and Mikko Haataja (Assis­tant Pro­fes­sor in the Mate­ri­als Group in Mechan­i­cal and Aero­space Engi­neer­ing) – dis­cussed their use of the University’s new cen­trally avail­able high-performance com­pu­ta­tional facil­i­ties recently fea­tured in a Prince­ton Weekly Bul­letin arti­cle.
Curt Hil­le­gas, OIT’s Man­ager of Com­pu­ta­tion Sci­ence and Engi­neer­ing Sup­port, began by review­ing the University’s recent progress in the area of high per­for­mance com­put­ing. He stressed the part­ner­ships that made these advances pos­si­ble, with sig­nif­i­cant con­tri­bu­tions from PIC­SciE (Prince­ton Insti­tute for Com­pu­ta­tion Sci­ence in Engi­neer­ing), OIT, SEAS
(The School of Engi­neer­ing and Applied Sci­ences), the Lewis Siegler Insti­tute for Inte­gra­tive Genomics, Astro­phys­i­cal Sci­ences, and the Prince­ton Plasma Physics Lab­o­ra­tory. Indi­vid­ual fac­ulty mem­bers have also con­tributed sig­nif­i­cant research fund­ing. Hil­le­gas revealed the name recently cho­sen for the infra­struc­ture: TIGRES, or Teras­cale Infra­struc­ture for Ground­break­ing Research in Engi­neer­ing and Science.


Also men­tioned in Hil­le­gas’ talk was a new large data stor­age sys­tem with 38 TB of stor­age that is going online at the end of the month. The sys­tem sup­ports a data access speed of approx­i­mately 200 MB/second to each of the three super­com­puter sys­tems. A fee of $2K/year/TB will be charged to recover half the cost.
Those inter­ested in gain­ing access to these super­com­puter sys­tems can sub­mit, to curt@princeton.edu, a 1–3 page pro­posal and include the sci­en­tific background/merit of the pro­posal, a sum­mary of resource require­ments, and a few ref­er­ences. A fac­ulty com­mit­tee will review the pro­pos­als sub­mit­ted.
haataja.jpg
Mikko Haataja (Assis­tant Pro­fes­sor in the Mate­ri­als Group in Mechan­i­cal and Aero­space Engi­neer­ing) high­lighted two projects within struc­ture dynam­ics and the self assem­bly of mate­ri­als that are tak­ing full advan­tage of the high per­for­mance com­put­ing facil­i­ties here at Prince­ton. Self assem­bly can be the aggre­ga­tion of mol­e­cules into struc­tures that then act as larger struc­tures. Many exam­ples of self-assembly within cells occur at every pos­si­ble scale in nature. The com­puter sim­u­la­tions help to explain where and how these struc­tures form. The two top­ics being inves­ti­gated involve the mol­e­c­u­lar dyman­ics of soft and “squishy” mate­ri­als as well as defor­ma­tion in hard mate­ri­als, all in the microsec­ond range.
High per­for­mance facil­i­ties have proved to be essen­tial for these mol­e­c­u­lar scale sim­u­la­tions. Exam­in­ing even a mod­est sys­tem with approx­i­mately 50,000 atoms, such as soap mol­e­cules aggre­gat­ing in water, with­out these super­com­put­ers would have been impos­si­ble. When we run the code using 32 of Orangena’s proces­sors, every 24 hours of com­put­ing time advances the sys­tem approx­i­mately 1.5 nanosec­onds, or half a life­time of such a sys­tem. Researchers can now start the sys­tem in a com­pletely ran­dom state and observe the aggre­ga­tion. Also being inves­ti­gated are the dynam­ics, ori­en­ta­tion, and inter­ac­tion of indi­vid­ual mol­e­cules on a sur­face.
Another aspect of the research is under­stand­ing how mate­ri­als deform. Most crys­talline mate­ri­als deform by way of motion of dis­lo­ca­tions or defects in a crys­talline lat­tice. The super­com­put­ers have per­mit­ted researchers to model dis­lo­ca­tions, a com­plex task given the fact that dis­lo­ca­tions become quite com­plex once dis­lo­ca­tions begin to cross one another. Many such inter­est­ing ques­tions in mate­ri­als sci­ence are being posed now that we have the com­pu­ta­tional resources.
stone.jpg
Jim Stone (Astro­phys­i­cal Sci­ences) began by com­ment­ing that much has changed in just the past three years, a sub­stan­tial ten-fold increase in high per­for­mance com­pu­ta­tional capa­bil­i­ties at the Uni­ver­sity that per­mits researchers to tackle prob­lems that are ten times larger.
Stone’s inter­est is pri­mar­ily in under­stand­ing the magneto-hydrodynamics [MHD] of plas­mas in phys­i­cal sys­tems. One exam­ple is how plasma is trans­ferred from stars onto com­pact objects such as white dwarfs, neu­tron stars, and black holes in close binary sys­tems. These sys­tems are about 20 orders of mag­ni­tude large than that in Mikko Haataja’s research. Plasma is being stripped off the sur­face of a nearby star, los­ing mass within close binary sys­tems. The mat­ter, with angu­lar momen­tum, does not fall directly onto the other object but rather spi­rals inwards.
Stone explained that the University’s com­pu­ta­tional facil­i­ties have been extremely impor­tant in tack­ling long stand­ing ques­tions asso­ci­ated with mag­netic fields, vis­cos­ity, tur­bu­lence, and orbital evo­lu­tion of the plasma.
tang.jpgBill Tang (Chief Sci­en­tist at PPPL and Asso­ciate Direc­tor of PIC­SciE) also inves­ti­gates plasma tur­bu­lence but on a dif­fer­ent scale and with a dif­fer­ent pur­pose, attempt­ing to con­trol and har­ness the ener­gies inher­ent in fusion reac­tions.
Plas­mas are called the fourth state of mat­ter, essen­tially very hot gasses that com­prise 99% of the vis­i­ble uni­verse. The main mis­sion of the Plasma Physics Lab­o­ra­tory is to under­stand what is takes to har­ness the fusion reac­tion in order to take advan­tage of this envi­ron­men­tally attrac­tive power that the world demands.
The key issue in the research is find­ing an effi­cient method to keep the plasma con­fined long enough for the fusion reac­tion to take place. In keep­ing with ther­mo­dy­namic prin­ci­ples, the plasma wants to escape and a myr­iad of insta­bil­i­ties can hap­pen within a closed sys­tem. Mag­netic trap­ping keeps par­ti­cles con­fined and oper­at­ing at very high tem­per­a­tures and at low den­si­ties.
With the use of pow­er­ful com­pu­ta­tional capa­bil­i­ties, PPPL is able to per­form real­is­tic sim­u­la­tions that study the struc­tures of par­ti­cles with and with­out flow. Tang noted that the lab is delighted with the University’s progress with these com­pu­ta­tional facil­i­ties and with their avail­abil­ity to both stu­dents and fac­ulty.
You may lis­ten to a pod­cast here.

This entry was posted in Lunch & Learn, Training and Outreach and tagged , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.