Lunch & Learn: Video Journey: Past, Present, Future

Final Cut Pro

Final Cut Pro (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

In its youth, which seems only now to be end­ing, film-making and film-editing required an immense amount of expen­sive and spe­cial­ized hard­ware and a hefty range of fine tech­ni­cal skills. Today, sug­gested Dave Hop­kins and Jim Grassi at the Octo­ber 27 Lunch ‘n Learn, even teenagers with afford­able hand-held devices can shoot, edit, and even dis­trib­ute films for the mass market.

Be sure to run through their slides which con­tain a range of clips that tell the story through film. There you can watch Fran­cis Ford Cop­pola pre­dict­ing in the 1970s that chil­dren would some­day be able to make movies of qual­ity. There too you can watch Gus van Sant, a mas­ter film edi­tor splic­ing tapes. Imag­ine the cum­ber­some task, when every scene and every noise involves a sep­a­rate reel of 35 mm film stock. There are still edi­tors who per­sist with such hand­i­work, manip­u­lat­ing bins of reels, but the immense power of new soft­ware, notably Final Cut Pro, has com­pelled most film­mak­ers to make the tran­si­tion to dig­i­tal. Films are now shot, edited, and deliv­ered dig­i­tally. The films never touch tape.

And watch the sim­ple film made by a father of his young son after a trip to the Den­tist. Meant to be shared with grand­par­ents and close friends, 70 mil­lion through YouTube have now viewed the amus­ing clip. An 8th grader named Brook Peters made a doc­u­men­tary about 9/11 that was so good that it is up for con­sid­er­a­tion at Tribecca. The point is, of course, that any­one with a cam­era, an idea, and some tal­ent can now reach a very large audi­ence. The bar­ri­ers to entry have been dras­ti­cally reduced.

Such tech­nolo­gies always trickle down­ward, sug­gests Hop­kins. Qual­ity no longer costs $15K. He showed a remark­able piece of footage taken with an iPhone. With­out hav­ing to rely on tape, there’s also an imme­di­acy with the film. There’s no longer a need to wait for post-production. Efforts, good and bad, can be sent instantly to YouTube.

New light pan­els are not only less expen­sive, he adds, but they also do not over­heat and no fil­ters are required for indoor shots.

Expect to see more use of the smaller tech­nolo­gies. The final episode of House this sea­son was filmed on a very small cam­era, mak­ing pos­si­ble footage in very closed spaces.

Hop­kins and Grassi sug­gest that, as a result of the new tech­nolo­gies, a new breed of pro­ducer has evolved, a video­g­ra­pher “pred­i­tor,” a one-person film shoot, from idea, to the writ­ing, the shoot­ing, the edit­ing, and even the distribution.

Soft­ware cer­tainly plays an impor­tant role in mak­ing the tech­nol­ogy so acces­si­ble. With Apple iLife, users can eas­ily locate related clips and pro­duce com­pelling movie trailers.

In the future, they sug­gest that we can look for­ward to bet­ter com­pres­sion to com­pen­sate for larger hard dri­ves, more video on walls, side­walks, streets, and 4-D TVs that will fill all the senses.

View the pre­sen­ta­tion: direct-download video (.mp4), stream­ing video (Flash)
An audio pod­cast of the pre­sen­ta­tion is also available.

This entry was posted in Lunch & Learn, Training and Outreach and tagged , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.