Lunch & Learn: The “Mapping Globalization” Project with Miguel Centeno and Manish Nag

 

GlobalizationMT.jpg

Detail from “Steamship routes of the World” circa 1900, the Amer­i­can Express Com­pany.

Map­ping Glob­al­iza­tion” was the topic of today’s Lunch ‘n Learn fea­tur­ing Pro­fes­sor Miguel Cen­teno and grad­u­ate stu­dent, Man­ish Nag, both of the Depart­ment of Soci­ol­ogy at Princeton.

Cen­teno began the talk by describ­ing the ori­gins of his inter­est in glob­al­iza­tion, about 11 years ago, about the time of Thomas L. Friedman’s first pub­li­ca­tions on his the­o­ries about the rela­tion­ships between nations (The Lexus and the Olive Tree, 2000 and The World is Flat, 2004). Cen­teno said it occurred to him that there were many ways to frame the sub­ject of glob­al­iza­tion, and that the process, in fact, had been going on for thou­sands of years. How, he won­dered, was the best approach to grasp the com­plex­ity of the con­cept with­out resort­ing to banalities–and what was the best way to dia­gram infor­ma­tion as com­plex as that describ­ing global trade?

The Inter­na­tional Net­works Archive

Centeno’s first attempt to answer that ques­tion was to develop the Inter­na­tional Net­works Archive, (INA), where he used graphic arts, among other things, to try to depict com­plex rela­tion­ships in easy-to-understand ways. Using some com­mon reports pub­lished by the United Nations, he used trade data to sup­port the gen­er­a­tion of dia­grams that showed some stun­ning con­clu­sions about global trans­ac­tions.  Cen­teno calls these images “info­graph­ics.” An exam­ple, The Magic Bean Shop and The Fries that Bind Us, are two of the dia­grams in the INA col­lec­tion. They show the effects of McDon­alds and Starbuck’s fran­chises on global trade. This dia­gram, he noted has been the most pop­u­lar on the site, hav­ing been reprinted mul­ti­ple times as an exam­ple of the sort of trends the INA is best at describing.

 

FriesAndBeans.png

The fries that bind us? A dia­gram show­ing the effects of Starbuck’s cof­fee shops and McDonald’s restau­rants on world trade. Image copy­right 2003, INA.

 

Glob­al­iza­tion is noth­ing more than a com­plex series of trans­ac­tions across the planet,” said Cen­teno, allud­ing to the strong con­nec­tions that can be made by ana­lyz­ing trade data. “Most of these data sets are avail­able pub­licly,” he noted, show­ing a table that tracks the annual num­ber of min­utes spent in phone com­mu­ni­ca­tions between coun­tries. Data about the imports of movies, books, as well as trade data, are among the many other ways to show how these trans­ac­tions take place through what seems like sim­ple exchanges.

The INA project was fol­lowed by the “Map­ping Glob­al­iza­tion,” where data was visu­al­ized in three dis­tinct ways.

Map­ping Glob­al­iza­tion

The first sec­tion of the Map­ping Glob­al­iza­tion site con­tains a col­lec­tion of maps, and links to maps of var­i­ous kinds: these include his­toric maps, inter­ac­tive maps, and mod­ern satel­lite imagery that help to con­vey the notion of geo­graphic loca­tion as a crit­i­cal, but often over­looked aspect of glob­al­iza­tion. “Glob­al­iza­tion involves con­nec­tions between at least two places,” the web­site explains, “and the first step in our under­stand­ing must be an appre­ci­a­tion of what this means in a con­crete sense of place.”

The sec­ond, and least devel­oped, sec­tion of the “Map­ping Glob­al­iza­tion” site is the “Nar­ra­tives” sec­tion, a series of ani­mated movies that show gen­eral trends in glob­al­iza­tion over time, such as “Migra­tions” and “Empires.”

Finally, the “Data and Analy­sis” sec­tion uses dia­grams gen­er­ated by tech­nol­ogy from NetMap Ana­lyt­ics, which cre­ates dia­grams show­ing the den­sity of trade between nations. Using data from GKG trade sta­tis­tics, NetMaps are cir­cu­lar dia­grams that show rela­tion­ships between var­i­ous coun­tries, grouped by con­ti­nent. Thresh­olds can be set on the data depicted to clar­ify the dia­grams. For instance, set­ting a thresh­old of f “0.3%” means that links cor­re­spond­ing to a trade share less than 0.3% of the total dol­lar value in the cat­e­gory are not shown in the diagram.

 

Thumbnail image for ApparalandAccessories1980_2001.png

Trade in Apparel and Acces­sories in 1980 and 2001 with a 0.3% thresh­old. From “Brief Intro­duc­tion to the Data and Selected Images from the GKG Project” by Miguel Cen­teno and Abi­gail Cook.

Despite best efforts at the time, there was no way for the NetMaps to be gen­er­ated dynam­i­cally on the web­site, how­ever images of sev­eral of the most inter­est­ing pat­terns can be found in the sec­tion of the site called “NetMap Com­bined Stud­ies.”

Map­Trade

The talk next focused on a project under­taken by Man­ish Nag, a grad­u­ate stu­dent in the Depart­ment of Soci­ol­ogy at Prince­ton who now stud­ies with Cen­teno. Nag explained his past career as an IT con­sul­tant, and his first inter­est in study­ing glob­al­iza­tion at Har­vard, study­ing with Jason Beck­field. At Har­vard, Nag worked on a project called Sonoma, as a way to visu­al­ize sta­tis­ti­cal data using maps. When he came to Prince­ton to con­tinue his stud­ies, he began to work with Cen­teno on mak­ing an inter­ac­tive data­base that would allow any­one to dia­gram world trade rela­tion­ships. The result was the Map­Trade project.

Map­Trade, still in beta, shows var­i­ous pro­jec­tions of a world map (Robin­son, Winkel Trip­pel, Gall-Peters, or equirec­tan­gu­lar are the map views that the inter­face sup­ports). Trade flows can be dia­grammed on top of the world pro­jec­tions, show­ing trade between selected nations, based on spe­cific com­modi­ties, or all trade between all nations. Trade data is avail­able for 1980, 1990, 2000 and 2009.

Using the inter­face, it is pos­si­ble to save gen­er­ated maps, so that com­par­isons can be drawn, and the results saved for use in research and pre­sen­ta­tion. As with the ear­lier NetMaps projects, fil­ters can be applied to clar­ify the data by set­ting thresh­olds, or by lim­it­ing the trans­ac­tions by their total per­cent­age of world trade.

Cen­teno and Nag used the Map­Trade inter­face to gen­er­ate a series of maps, show­ing the shift in trade cen­ters over time.

 

WheatAllNationsTop75_1980.JPG

A dia­gram show­ing the top 75% of trade in wheat among all nations, 1980. Image gen­er­ated by MapTrade.

WheatAllNationsTop75_2009.JPG

A dia­gram show­ing the top 75% of trade in wheat among all nations, 2009. Image gen­er­ated by MapTrade

The audi­ence then requested sev­eral maps show­ing var­i­ous com­modi­ties, coun­tries and time periods.

 

Who knew so many fish sticks were traded between the U.S. and China in 2009? That the top 50% of word trade involves only 10 coun­tries? You may have sus­pected these things; Map­Trade can draw you the pic­ture to prove it!

A future phase of Cen­teno and Nag’s col­lab­o­ra­tion will include mak­ing the NetMaps data inter­ac­tive, much in the way that Map­Trade cur­rently is, so that users can gen­er­ate and save their own diagrams.

 

Links to all three of the projects dis­cussed in today’s talk can be found at:

www.princeton.edu/globalization

 

A pod­cast of the talk can be found here.

 

Enhanced by Zemanta
This entry was posted in Lunch & Learn, Training and Outreach and tagged , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.