Current Barriers to Bridging the Gap: A Follow-Up

| 4 Comments

This week's news provides one example of the political kinks between research and policy. The New York Times reports that federal funding for six new evidence-based initiatives will be significantly cut or eliminated under a new House proposal. Future of Children researchers show that one program funded by the initiatives, the Nurse-Family Partnership discussed in the previous blog, delays second births and reduces child maltreatment among teenage mothers.

 

While no decisions have been finalized yet, experts are concerned about the future of such programs. Brookings scholar and Senior Editor for the Future of Children Ron Haskins asks in the Times article, "Why, in a constrained budget environment, do you cut the programs that have to show they're working? It makes no sense." For more comments by Ron Haskins, see the Brookings Institution blog on this topic. Also see policy suggestions in the Future of Children.

4 Comments

Thanks for your patience in researching this issues. I'm very impressed.

Thanks. I'm very impressed.

Interesting - this is always a concern with government funding of any project. When the bottom line is an issue they cut budgets no matter what the ramifications are.

interesting, i think goverment must give this grandt

Leave a comment

Archives

Recent Comments

  • ladder: interesting, i think goverment must give this grandt…
    read more
  • Mike Desert: Interesting - this is always a concern with government funding…
    read more
  • ProjeX: Thanks. I'm very impressed.…
    read more
  • coconut meat: Thanks for your patience in researching this issues. I'm very…
    read more