Meet Mudd’s Maureen Callahan

Thumbnail image for CallahanImageWarthog
Mau­reen made fast friends with this warthog who was a part of the hotel where she was stay­ing while work­ing on an archives project at the Uni­ver­sity of Fort Hare in Alice, East­ern Cape, South Africa.

Name/Title: Mau­reen Calla­han — Pub­lic Pol­icy Papers Project Archivist

Title/Duties: My offi­cial job title is Pub­lic Pol­icy Papers Project Archivist. Like every­one at Mudd, I do a lot of dif­fer­ent things, but my main focus is being a good inter­me­di­ary between the feet, yards, even miles of archival records that we have and researchers who want to come to use them. I spend time fig­ur­ing out how to describe mate­ri­als in aggre­gate and make sense of their con­text and con­tent. Or, to put it another way, I dig through a lot of dusty stuff so you don’t have to.

I also work with other archivists and librar­i­ans here to lever­age the tools of a net­worked world to make our resources avail­able to peo­ple who might never be able to come to Prince­ton to do research. We’re look­ing at pos­si­bil­i­ties for mass dig­i­ti­za­tion so that we can put our actual stuff – and not just descrip­tions of it – on the internet.

Recent projects: Part of the rea­son why I enjoy my job so much is because I get to do a lot of dif­fer­ent things. Dan Linke and I are cur­rently work­ing on an exhibit about the 1912 elec­tion – read­ing about char­ac­ters like Eugene Debs, Teddy Roo­sevelt, Woodrow Wil­son (and let’s face it, to a lesser extent) William Howard Taft is extremely engag­ing, and we’re hav­ing fun think­ing about ways to explain the con­texts and par­al­lels of 1912 and today.

Over the sum­mer I processed the papers of Judge Harold R. Med­ina, a fig­ure so well-known dur­ing the 1940s and ‘50s that he made the cover of Time mag­a­zine, but who is rarely ref­er­enced today. Med­ina presided over the trial of the lead­ers of the Com­mu­nist Party, USA, and over a huge anti-trust case against invest­ment bank­ing firms in the early 1950s. After spend­ing qual­ity time with Judge Med­ina, I would say that there are pos­si­bly dozens of arti­cles and dis­ser­ta­tions to be writ­ten from the con­tent of his records. I hope that we see an uptick in researchers now that his papers are more fully processed!

Worked at Mudd since: I’ve worked at Mudd since Feb­ru­ary of 2011. Before that, I led a project to dig­i­tize rare mate­ri­als from the Mid­dle East and North Africa at George Wash­ing­ton Uni­ver­sity, and pre­vi­ous to that I was an archivist at the Penn Museum.

Why I like my job/archives: Well, at an eso­teric level, I believe that an hon­est look at the his­tor­i­cal record tends to destroy pre­vi­ous con­cep­tions of what is nor­mal, and I think that there’s some­thing extremely lib­er­at­ing about this. Even Mudd’s records of fairly main­stream char­ac­ters have the power to chal­lenge my pre­vi­ous con­cep­tions of how power presents itself, how peo­ple behave, and how the nation operates.

Much more con­cretely, I like work­ing with peo­ple and I like work­ing with tech­nol­ogy. We get a lot of ques­tions that start with “my ances­tor went to Prince­ton. Can you tell me about him?” I appre­ci­ate the chance to con­nect peo­ple with the peo­ple who came before them, and some­times sur­prise them with the rich­ness of our records. This process is reward­ing, and I’m opti­mistic about the capa­bil­i­ties of the web to bring our resources to more people.

Favorite item/collection: I’m not sure if it’s my favorite, but last year we acces­sioned the records of Elmer C. Werner, an IRS agent who had the goods on Halliburton’s (well, the group that existed that even­tu­ally became Hal­libur­ton) ille­gal con­tri­bu­tions to Lyn­don Baines Johnson’s sen­ate cam­paign. I wrote a blog post about it, which tells the whole sor­did story:

blogs.princeton.edu/mudd/2011/03/how-high-can-an-income-tax-fix-go-the-lbj-tax-scandal-that-youve-probably-never-heard-of.html