Science powerhouses around the globe

“Glob­al­iz­ing Sci­ence” by Tom Price, Jan. 28, 2011

“Are tra­di­tional sci­en­tific pow­er­houses los­ing their edge?

The United States, Europe and Japan are begin­ning to lose their tra­di­tional dom­i­nance in sci­ence and tech­nol­ogy — not because they are doing less, but because the rest of the world is doing more. China, India, South­east Asia, South Korea and Tai­wan have all increased their share of patents, schol­arly sci­en­tific arti­cles, research-and-development spend­ing and researchers, while the share held by the United States, Euro­pean nations and Japan has declined. As devel­op­ing coun­tries mount their own research enter­prises, the world of high tech­nol­ogy is being trans­formed. China last year unveiled the world’s fastest super­com­puter, a dis­tinc­tion that had belonged to the United States and Japan. Inter­na­tional sci­en­tific col­lab­o­ra­tions are on the upswing, West­ern uni­ver­si­ties are build­ing branch cam­puses over­seas, and multi­na­tional cor­po­ra­tions are locat­ing their research, devel­op­ment and high-tech man­u­fac­tur­ing oper­a­tions abroad. Most experts say tra­di­tional sci­ence pow­er­houses won’t be replaced any­time soon by rapidly devel­op­ing coun­tries such as India and China, how­ever, in part because those coun­tries’ edu­ca­tional sys­tems don’t yet nur­ture innovation.”

Source:  CQ Global Researcher, CQ Researcher  Alert, 2/3/11 

Chinese Journals: appeal for open access

 Chi­nese sci­en­tist appeals for fund­ing to make Chi­nese jour­nals OA05 Sep 2008

Zhu Zuoyan, a recently retired deputy head of the National Sci­ence Foun­da­tion of China (NSFC), has report­edly appealed for fund­ing to make sev­eral Chi­nese jour­nals open access (OA). To boost the country’s sci­en­tific jour­nals, he urged to give pri­or­ity to domes­tic sci­ence publications.

Accord­ing to Zuoyan, government-funded open access jour­nals could be a break­through for sci­ence pub­lish­ing in China. He fur­ther stated that OA jour­nals pri­ori­tise aca­d­e­mic mer­its over com­mer­cial inter­ests. A government-funded open access ini­tia­tive would lessen or elim­i­nate the cost of pub­lish­ing, thereby allow­ing Chi­nese jour­nals to attract more high-quality papers and improve their impact.

Zhu’s remarks come amidst crit­i­cisms that Chi­nese sci­en­tists are pub­lish­ing more in over­seas jour­nals than domes­tic ones. Accord­ing to a study by Wang Bing­sheng, a lead­ing physi­cist and edi­tor of the jour­nal Chi­nese Physics Let­ters, in 2006, over 80 per­cent of Chi­nese physics papers pub­lished in jour­nals, listed in the Sci­ence Cita­tion Index (SCI), were pub­lished in inter­na­tional journals.

Also, it has been observed that sci­ence insti­tu­tions in China often assess the out­puts of their sci­en­tists using the impact fac­tors of the jour­nals where they pub­lish their papers. Many inter­na­tional jour­nals have higher impact fac­tors than domes­tic ones.

This trend among Chi­nese sci­en­tists to pub­lish more in over­seas jour­nals, some say, may endan­ger the exis­tence of the 5,000 sci­en­tific jour­nals pub­lished in China.”

Source: Knowl­edge­s­peak Newsletter.