Cloud data storage for medical records — bad idea

Top 10 list rejects cloud for clin­i­cal data

By George Miller

Com­ment | For­ward | Twit­ter | Face­book | LinkedIn

The debate con­tin­ues over whether cloud plat­forms can secure highly sen­si­tive clin­i­cal trial data and health records. But eWeek makes no bones about its posi­tion in a top 10 list of why it’s a bad idea to store such records up there.

The 11-slide pre­sen­ta­tion encap­su­lates both well-known and less-well-known argu­ments for data stor­age via local ser­vices rather than an Internet-based, on-demand sys­tem. Among them: the highly sen­si­tive nature of the data makes it a hacker tar­get from the get-go.

Trust is a fac­tor that runs through­out the list: trust in the cloud ser­vice provider that it can and will restrict access to the barest min­i­mum, that it truly de-personalizes data, and even that it will still be in exis­tence tomorrow.

A dis­clo­sure state­ment con­cern­ing source mate­r­ial explains the anti-cloud bias. But the list remains a use­ful one.

- here’s the slide show

Related Arti­cles:
Experts: Beware of breaches in cloud com­put­ing
Cloud experts agree: choose care­fully

Source: Fierce­Biotech IT [editors@fiercebiotechit.com] 8.23.10