Petition for Public Access to all Publicly-funded Research

ASU (Ari­zona State Uni­ver­sity) Libraries have posted a con­cise piece about Open Access to schol­arly research in ” The Library Chan­nel” newslet­ter:  http://lib.asu.edu/librarychannel/2012/05/21/petition/

There is a video and a link to more infor­ma­tion as well as the peti­tion at http://www.whitehouse.gov

Freely share the data and the knowledge!

 

National Library of Medicine adopts auto-complete feature

  “*NLM Tech­ni­cal Bul­letin, Nov-Dec 2011, Search Auto-Complete Fea­ture Added to NLM Main Web Site, Med­line­Plus and Med­line­Plus en Español

  http://www.nlm.nih.gov/pubs/techbull/nd11/nd11_mplus_auto_complete.html ”

From NLM New files for the week of Nov 7, 2011

National Institutes of Health: Research Matters

 

National Insti­tutes of Health: Research Mat­ters

http://www.nih.gov/researchmatters/

“The National Insti­tutes of Health (NIH) gen­er­ates thou­sands of pieces of impor­tant research every year, and even the most ded­i­cated indi­vid­ual would be hard pressed to keep track of all these items. The Research Mat­ters site from NIH makes this all a snap, as users can peruse the lat­est news releases from their many dif­fer­ent research divi­sions. To get started, first-time vis­i­tors may want to look at the “Editor’s Picks”, which have included pieces like “Aspects of Aging Might be Reversed” and “Con­trol­ling Com­put­ers with Your Mind”. There’s also a search engine on the home­page, and vis­i­tors can sub­scribe to their RSS feed or sign up for reg­u­lar email updates. On the left-hand side of the home­page, vis­i­tors will find “Quick Links” to mul­ti­me­dia fea­tures, the “News in Health” newslet­ter, and var­i­ous podcasts.”

The update is weekly, and one can sub­scribe.Source:  Today’s Scout Report, Univ. of Wisconsin 

Database of Genomic Structural Variation (dbVar)

 

From NIH News: “The National Insti­tutes of Health today announces the launch of a new resource, called the Data­base of Genomic Struc­tural Vari­a­tion, or dbVar, to help sci­en­tists under­stand how dif­fer­ences in DNA con­tribute to human health and dis­ease.”.

Thanks to Tara Cal­ishain and her newslet­ter, Research­Buzz, Octo­ber 4, 2010

OSTI, the science & technology portal of the U.S. Government

OSTI, the Office of Sci­ence and Tech­nol­ogy Infor­ma­tion is worth book­mark­ing.  It serves as a por­tal for most of the fed­eral goverment’s infor­ma­tion, reports and data for 18 agen­cies:

Agriculture,Commerce, Defense, Edu­ca­tion, Energy, Health & Human Ser­vices, Inte­rior, Trans­porta­tion, Envi­ron­men­tal Pro­tec­tion Agency, Library of Con­gress, National Aero­nau­tics & Space Admin­is­tra­tion, National Archives & Records Admin­stra­tion, National Sci­ence Foun­da­tion, and the US Gov­ern­ment Pub­li­ca­tions Office.

Ter­mi­nol­ogy and the­sauri might help in your infor­ma­tion searches.

This site is a gate­way to DOE col­lec­tions at ScienceAccelerator.gov, global sci­ence via WorldWideScience.org, sci­en­tific research data as an open gov­ern­ment ini­tia­tive, and the OSTIblog.

Much of this, they declare, is out­side Google’s purview — in the “deep web.”

Scientific Research support: funding and collaboration tools

The NIH grabbed $10 bil­lion of tax­pay­ers’ funds fun­neled through the stim­u­lus bill, and NIH chief Fran­cis Collins says the money was used to save or cre­ate 50,000 research jobs. In many cases, he adds, the extra funds have kept America’s sci­en­tists in Amer­i­can labs.” 

- here’s the story from Bloomberg

From Fierce­Biotech Research [editors@fiercebioresearcher.com]  1/5/10, by John Carroll

_____________________________________________________________

 

National net­work­ing pro­vides oppor­tu­ni­ties for sci­en­tists to col­lab­o­rate in new, excit­ing ways to improve abil­i­ties to uncover under­ly­ing path­ways and mech­a­nisms of biol­ogy and to develop new diag­nos­tics, treat­ments and pre­ven­tion strate­gies,” said NCRR Direc­tor Bar­bara Alv­ing, M.D. “The infra­struc­ture cre­ated and imple­mented through these awards has the poten­tial to greatly facil­i­tate the pace of bio­med­ical research nationwide.”

- here’s the NIH release
- check out a list of project part­ner insti­tu­tions here   — besides Har­vard and U of Florida

Read more: http://www.fiercebiotechresearch.com/story/nih-seeds-scientific-networking-projects-27m/2009–11-02?utm_medium=nl&utm_source=internal#ixzz0bxKR7UYy
 

Also from Fierce­Biotech Research [editors@fiercebioresearcher.com] 11/2/09, by John Carroll

U.S. Government invites comments on Open Access Policy

 US US gov­ern­ment launches inter­ac­tive pub­lic forum on Pub­lic Access Pol­icy11 Dec 2009

The USOffice of Sci­ence and Tech­nol­ogy Pol­icy (OSTP) has launched a pub­lic con­sul­ta­tion on its Pub­lic Access Pol­icy. The Admin­is­tra­tion is seek­ing pub­lic input on access to publicly-funded research results, such as those that appear in aca­d­e­mic and schol­arly jour­nal arti­cles. Cur­rently, the National Insti­tutes of Health (NIH) require that research funded by its grants be made avail­able to the pub­lic online at no charge within 12 months of pub­li­ca­tion. The Admin­is­tra­tion is seek­ing views as to whether this pol­icy should be extended to other sci­ence agen­cies and, if so, how it should be implemented.

OSTP launched an inter­ac­tive, online dis­cus­sion on Decem­ber 10. The dis­cus­sion is focused on three major areas of inter­est. These include: Imple­men­ta­tion (Dec. 10 to 20): Which Fed­eral agen­cies are good can­di­dates to adopt pub­lic access poli­cies? What vari­ables (field of sci­ence, pro­por­tion of research funded by pub­lic or pri­vate enti­ties, etc.) should affect how pub­lic access is imple­mented at var­i­ous agen­cies, includ­ing the max­i­mum length of time between pub­li­ca­tion a pub­lic release?; Fea­tures and Tech­nol­ogy (Dec. 21 to 31): In what for­mat should the data be sub­mit­ted in order to make it easy to search and retrieve infor­ma­tion, and to make it easy for oth­ers to link to it? Are there exist­ing dig­i­tal stan­dards for archiv­ing and inter­op­er­abil­ity to max­imise pub­lic ben­e­fit? How are these antic­i­pated to change; and Man­age­ment (Jan. 1 to 7): What are the best mech­a­nisms to ensure com­pli­ance? What would be the best met­rics of suc­cess? What are the best exam­ples of usabil­ity in the pri­vate sec­tor (both domes­tic and inter­na­tional)? Should those who access papers be given the oppor­tu­nity to com­ment or pro­vide feedback?

Each of these top­ics will form the basis of a blog post­ing that will appear at www.whitehouse.gov/open and will be open for com­ment on the OSTP blog.

Search for more Pub­lic funded research infor­ma­tion in K-Store

Source: Knowl­edge­s­peak Newslet­ter
 

Indiana Univ. to use cloud computing in life science research

From today’s Fierce­biotech News, Fierce­Biotech IT [editors@fiercebiotechit.com]

By George Miller
“… Indi­ana Uni­ver­sity is spend­ing $1.5 mil­lion from the National Insti­tutes of Health on…high-end com­put­ing dis­cov­ery tools. The Hoosiers’ Per­va­sive Tech­nol­ogy Insti­tute Dig­i­tal Sci­ence Cen­ter is tar­get­ing cloud com­put­ing to sup­port life sci­ence research.
In addi­tion to bust­ing com­put­ing bot­tle­necks, the cen­ter plans to use the cloud for ana­lyz­ing sequenc­ing data, the vol­ume of which is “one to two orders of mag­ni­tude larger than pos­si­ble with cur­rent com­pu­ta­tional capa­bil­i­ties,” accord­ing to an indus­try arti­cle. Ama­zon Web Ser­vices, Microsoft Azure, and other open source soft­ware are expected to be part of the installation.
The center’s research team will part­ner with IU life sci­ence research teams to test the plat­form in such research areas as sequence assem­bly and pop­u­la­tion genomics. Cloud tech­nolo­gies will also be applied to gene fam­ily clus­ter­ing and struc­tural visualization.
The IU work is also sup­ported by the National Sci­ence Foun­da­tion via its Future­Grid exper­i­men­tal super­com­put­ing net­work project.”
- see the arti­cle

There are other inter­est­ing sto­ries too:

Pitt hits com­put­ing jack­pot
Hoosiers tap cloud for sequenc­ing
Nano, in vivo 3D gains for imag­ing
Remote imager to pro­vide dis­ease data

 click here to read it on the web.. or here:

http://www.uptilt.com/functions/message_view.html?mid=2164839&mlid=125589&siteid=8121&uid=4a81392a19

NIH Open Access Policy — SPARC enews

The Open Access Pol­icy pro­posed by the National Insti­tutes of Health has been made permanent.

To read more about the pol­icy see the entry 

Here is the 1st paragraph:

Wash­ing­ton, D.C. – March 12, 2009 – Pres­i­dent Obama yes­ter­day signed into law the 2009 Con­sol­i­dated Appro­pri­a­tions Act, which includes a pro­vi­sion mak­ing the National Insti­tutes’ of Health (NIH) Pub­lic Access Pol­icy per­ma­nent. The NIH Revised Pol­icy on Enhanc­ing Pub­lic Access requires eli­gi­ble NIH-funded researchers to deposit elec­tronic copies of their peer-reviewed man­u­scripts into the National Library of Medicine’s online archive, PubMed Cen­tral (PMC). Full texts of the arti­cles are made pub­licly avail­able and search­able online in PMC no later than 12 months after pub­li­ca­tion in a journal.”

Source: the SPARC enews which comes out monthly from The Schol­arly Pub­lish­ing & Aca­d­e­mic Resources Coalition.

BioOne releases new model publication agreement

BioOne releases new model pub­li­ca­tion agree­ment10 Apr 2008

BioOne, US, a web-based aggre­ga­tor of research in bio­log­i­cal, eco­log­i­cal and envi­ron­men­tal sci­ences, has announced the release of a model pub­li­ca­tion agree­ment that addresses cur­rent trends in copy­right assign­ment and require­ments by NIH and other fund­ing agen­cies for dig­i­tal repos­i­tory deposits. The agree­ment, devel­oped at the request of sev­eral BioOne pub­lish­ers, may be of inter­est to any schol­arly pub­lish­ing organ­i­sa­tion that is seek­ing a clear, con­cise, and legally vet­ted pub­li­ca­tion agreement.”

The final Agree­ment is cur­rently avail­able for free on the BioOne web­site at www.bioone.org. An accom­pa­ny­ing ‘roadmap’ is also avail­able to pro­vide pub­lish­ers adopt­ing the agree­ment with guid­ance on spe­cific author and pub­lisher rights and amend­able sections.”

Click here

Source:  Knowl­edge­s­peak Newsletter

Con­tinue read­ing