Lauren Davis ’14, Boston University School of Law

Day One:

The three of us, me and my fel­low Princeterns, arrived in Pro­fes­sor Fleming’s office at 9 am, and had a chance to hear the full account of how he came to be a Law Pro­fes­sor, from col­lege to the present day. We shared our var­i­ous aca­d­e­mic inter­ests with him, and Pro­fes­sor Flem­ing in turn set up a vari­ety of appoint­ments with other BU Law pro­fes­sors whose work over­lapped with our inter­ests. At 10 am, one of his stu­dents came in to talk about an upcom­ing paper on Con­sti­tu­tional the­ory, as well as to update Pro­fes­sor Flem­ing on the duties she had com­pleted as his research assis­tant for his upcom­ing book. This meet­ing touched upon three of Pro­fes­sor Fleming’s roles at BU Law — a pro­fes­sor of Con­sti­tu­tional Law (a first year class) and Con­sti­tu­tional The­ory (an upper level sem­i­nar), an author of esteemed aca­d­e­mic lit­er­a­ture (his most recent book is about to go to press, and was co-authored by his wife Linda McClain, who is also a pro­fes­sor at BU), and the fac­ulty advi­sor for the BU Law Review. After this meet­ing, we got the chance to meet two pro­fes­sors spe­cial­iz­ing in Health Law and Inter­na­tional Law. Finally, at 2 pm we headed to Pro­fes­sor Fleming’s two hour lec­ture on Con­sti­tu­tional Law.

Day Two:

Dr. Flem­ing and his Princeterns

 

We started the day with another meet­ing between Pro­fes­sor Flem­ing and oneof his students/research assis­tants. After this, we sat in on his meet­ing with the Dean of BU Law, get­ting the chance to see how a law school works from the admin­is­tra­tion side, such as con­ver­sa­tions about how to give fund­ing to pro­fes­sors for research, the topic for the next big col­lo­quium Pro­fes­sor Flem­ing is orga­niz­ing, main­tain­ing a bal­ance between a the­o­ret­i­cal and a prac­ti­cal law edu­ca­tion, and select­ing new pro­fes­sors for tenure. We ate lunch at a fac­ulty paper work­shop where a vis­it­ing pro­fes­sor pre­sented his paper on the applic­a­bil­ity of for­eign laws in the U.S., and after­wards took ques­tions and feed­back from his col­leagues. We ended the day by sit­ting in on Pro­fes­sor Fleming’s sec­ond class — his upper level Con­sti­tu­tional The­ory sem­i­nar. Thank you Pro­fes­sor Flem­ing for being such a ded­i­cated host and giv­ing us a fas­ci­nat­ing two day oppor­tu­nity to glimpse the life of a law pro­fes­sor! I really was able to put myself in the shoes of a law stu­dent and get expo­sure to a vari­ety of top­ics within the aca­d­e­mic branch of law.

 

Samantha Batel ’13, Boston University School of Law

Dur­ing my two-day Princetern­ship expe­ri­ence, I shad­owed Pro­fes­sor James Flem­ing, the Asso­ciate Dean for Research and Intel­lec­tual Life at Boston Uni­ver­sity Law School. Along with two other stu­dents, I sat in on Pro­fes­sor Fleming’s meet­ings with research assis­tants, par­tic­i­pated in a fac­ulty work­shop, and attended two of Pro­fes­sor Fleming’s classes. In between these activ­i­ties, Pro­fes­sor Flem­ing spent a con­sid­er­able amount of time field­ing our ques­tions about both law school and law as a future pro­fes­sion. He was extremely open to dis­cussing what­ever top­ics we brought up and was excited to show us around his office.

On the first day, after going through intro­duc­tory infor­ma­tion, we met one of Pro­fes­sor Fleming’s research assis­tants who was help­ing to fact check his upcom­ing book’s foot­notes. She also came to dis­cuss a paper topic for one of the professor’s classes, Con­sti­tu­tional The­ory. This meet­ing was inter­est­ing because we were able to hear about law school from the per­spec­tive of a cur­rent stu­dent. Later that day, we sat in on the professor’s other course, Con­sti­tu­tional Law. It was very sim­i­lar to classes here at Prince­ton, such as Civil Lib­er­ties, and I enjoyed lis­ten­ing to the mate­r­ial from the view­point of a law school course. Other encoun­ters through­out the day included con­ver­sa­tions with fac­ulty mem­bers who were excited to share pieces of their work with us.

On the sec­ond day, after meet­ing with another research assis­tant, we attended a fac­ulty work­shop where a vis­it­ing assis­tant pro­fes­sor pre­sented a draft of his paper to his col­leagues. Those at the work­shop gave the pro­fes­sor help­ful feed­back and sup­ported a lively dis­cus­sion of his work. Later, we attended Pro­fes­sor Fleming’s Con­sti­tu­tional The­ory class, a course very sim­i­lar to sem­i­nars at Prince­ton. Later that evening, we enjoyed a din­ner with Pro­fes­sor Flem­ing and his fam­ily at his home in Brook­line, Mass­a­chu­setts. His fam­ily was wel­com­ing and inter­ested in learn­ing about our dif­fer­ent backgrounds.

Dr. Flem­ing and his Princeterns

Over­all, I found this Princetern­ship to be extremely valu­able because it enabled me to see both the inner work­ings of a law school and the law stu­dent point of view. Every­one there was eager to share their expe­ri­ences and aca­d­e­mic inter­ests and I found the atmos­phere to be very sup­port­ive. I would rec­om­mend this shad­ow­ing oppor­tu­nity to stu­dents as a great way to spend two days with other like-minded Prince­ton stu­dents in an inter­est­ing new environment.