Residential Colleges and Wu Hall

In this short video from around 1983, Pres­i­dent Bowen dis­cusses Wu Hall, the then-new din­ing facil­ity for But­ler College. The video high­lights three ele­ments that played increas­ingly sig­nif­i­cant roles in shap­ing Prince­ton over the fol­low­ing decades: the sup­port of alum­nus Gor­don Wu, the res­i­den­tial col­leges sys­tem, and the archi­tec­ture of alum­nus Robert Venturi.

We don’t know the exact pur­pose for which this video was cre­ated, but it may have been part of the pro­mo­tional mate­r­ial for A Cam­paign for Prince­ton, the fundrais­ing cam­paign that offi­cially ran from 1982 to 1986. As pre­vi­ously dis­cussed on this blogA Cam­paign for Prince­tonwas enor­mously suc­cess­ful, bring­ing in an aver­age of $1,000,000 per week at its height.The Sup­port of Gor­don Wu ’58

In 1981, before the cam­paign even offi­cially began, alum­nus Gor­don Y.S. Wu donated $1,000,000 to it. Wu earned a Bachelor’s of Sci­ence in Engi­neer­ing from Prince­ton in 1958 and sub­se­quently returned to his native Hong Kong. There, he founded Hopewell Hold­ings, a firm whose notable projects have included high­ways, hotels, rail­roads and power plants through­out Asia. Wu has been described as one of the wealth­i­est busi­ness­men in Hong Kong and as one of the most influ­en­tial engi­neers and busi­ness­men in the world.
As A Cam­paign for Prince­ton was offi­cially being launched in 1982, Prince­ton announced that Wu had donated an addi­tional 25 mil­lion Hong Kong dol­lars in honor of his class’s upcom­ing 25th anniver­sary reunion. The funds, then equal to approx­i­mately USD $4.3 mil­lion, were used pri­mar­ily to con­struct a din­ing facil­ity for the then-new But­ler College.
As gen­er­ous as these dona­tions were, they rep­re­sented only a small frac­tion of what was to come. In 1995, Wu made a his­toric pledge to the With One Accord fundrais­ing cam­paign, which was held as part of the University’s 250th anniver­sary. That year, Wu pledged to donate USD $100 mil­lion, the largest gift ever by a for­eigner to a U.S. uni­ver­sity, with the last pay­ment sched­uled to coin­cide with his class’ 50th anniver­sary reunion in 2008. Wu is cur­rently serv­ing as a Trustee of Prince­ton Uni­ver­sity, with a term end­ing in 2012.
BowenWuHall.jpg

The Vision of William Bowen *58

Although dwarfed in mag­ni­tude by his later dona­tions, Wu’s 1982 dona­tion has impacted the lives of lit­er­ally thou­sands of Prince­to­ni­ans. It gave phys­i­cal form to Pres­i­dent Bowen’s aspi­ra­tions for the res­i­den­tial col­lege sys­tem, which has defined the Prince­ton under­grad­u­ate expe­ri­ence for every class since.
Pres­i­dent Bowen (right) formed the Com­mit­tee on Under­grad­u­ate Res­i­den­tial Life (CURL) in 1978. Made up of admin­is­tra­tors, fac­ulty and stu­dents, the com­mit­tee was charged with address­ing the inter­twined issues of Prince­ton stu­dent hous­ing, din­ing and social­iza­tion. Although some of the pro­pos­als in the committee’s final report – par­tic­u­larly those relat­ing to eat­ing clubs – did not come to pass, its pri­mary pro­posal, the estab­lish­ment of three new res­i­den­tial col­leges, came to fruition within a few short years.
Two of the three new col­leges, Rock­e­feller and Mathey, were estab­lished in extant build­ings in Princeton’s tra­di­tional col­le­giate gothic style. But­ler Col­lege, how­ever, was housed in the “New New Quad,” which the Daily Prince­ton­ian defined for incom­ing fresh­man as, Group of five newer dorms located on the lower-lower cam­pus, fondly known as “The Sticks,” “New New World,” or “Brave New Quad.””
The con­struc­tion of Wu Hall trans­formed this “group of dorms” into a true res­i­den­tial col­lege. As the first Mas­ter of But­ler Col­lege, Emory Elliot, said near the end of the first semes­ter that Wu Hall was open, “It’s enabled the spirit of the col­lege to come into full blos­som.” He also described the new servery and din­ing facil­ity as hav­ing a “friendly atmos­phere con­ducive to hav­ing peo­ple come together.” Footage about But­ler Col­lege and Wu Hall after the 2009 ren­o­va­tions can be found here.

The Archi­tec­ture of Robert Ven­turi ’47, *50

In keep­ing with Wu Hall’s sym­bolic role as the van­guard of a new mode of Prince­ton under­grad­u­ate life, the uni­ver­sity chose an archi­tect known for his inno­v­a­tive and thought­ful work: Robert Ven­turi, who grad­u­ated from Prince­ton in 1947 and also earned an M.F.A. from Prince­ton in 1950. Venturi’s firm, Ven­turi, Scott Brown and Asso­ciates, describes the Wu Hall project this way:
The firm faced the chal­lenge of cre­at­ing a new build­ing that would pro­vide an iden­tity for the new col­lege, serve as a focal point for its social life and also give a sense of cohe­sive­ness with other But­ler Col­lege facil­i­ties in two exist­ing build­ings of dis­parate styles … The building’s design takes impor­tant cues from adja­cent struc­tures but also pro­motes an iden­tity of its own… Brick walls, lime­stone trim and strip win­dows adhere to the tra­di­tional Gothic archi­tec­ture of Prince­ton. The main entrance, set off-center and broad­side in the build­ing, is marked by a bold mar­ble and gray gran­ite panel recall­ing early Renais­sance orna­ment and sym­bol­iz­ing the entrance to the Col­lege as a whole as well as to the build­ing itself.
WuHallUnusual.jpgWu Hall was a crit­i­cal and artis­tic suc­cess, win­ning eight dif­fer­ent awards for its archi­tec­ture and inte­rior design. As noted by Prince­ton Uni­ver­sity Inter­ac­tive Cam­pus His­tory, “This crit­i­cal acclaim was some­thing new for the Uni­ver­sity, which had been cas­ti­gated for years for the styl­is­tic timid­ity of its mod­ern build­ings — espe­cially when com­pared to the archi­tec­tural dar­ing of its peers in New Haven and Cambridge.” A pre­lim­i­nary study for the entrance and ele­va­tion, and a pre­lim­i­nary study of the entrance and win­dows now reside in The Museum of Mod­ern Art.
Not all reac­tions to Wu Hall were pos­i­tive, how­ever. The anti-Venturi mood among stu­dents reached a fever pitch in Feb­ru­ary 1986, when it was announced that his firm had been selected to design what would be its third build­ing on cam­pus. The pages of the Daily Prince fea­tured impas­sioned edi­to­ri­als and let­ters on the sub­ject, includ­ing a notable point-counterpoint piece in which Daniel M. Fuchs ’87 wrote:
…(T)he inte­rior of the build­ing gives a new mean­ing to the phrase “incom­pe­tent design­ing.” A great deal of space is com­pletely use­less, while other areas are so crowded as to make Nas­sau Street at rush hour seem empty in com­par­i­son. More­over, if some­one were to try to design a din­ing hall nosier than the one Mr. Ven­turi gave us, the feat would undoubt­edly con­sume sev­eral years of cease­less toil … If we want Mr. Venturi’s kind of post­mod­ernistic gar­ish trash, we can ask Hel­mut Jahn or Michael Graves to design the new build­ing… If we want an archi­tect with a link to Prince­ton Uni­ver­sity, such indi­vid­u­als are legion (includ­ing, unfor­tu­nately, Mr. Graves)
Even the stu­dent who wrote the pro-Venturi piece for that issue, Marc Pic­ciotto ’86, noted that, “It has become fash­ion­able at Prince­ton to crit­i­cize the cam­pus archi­tec­ture of Robert Ven­turi ’47.”
Sev­eral months later, the Daily Prince pub­lished an inter­view with Ven­turi about his work on the Prince­ton cam­pus, and about his archi­tec­tural beliefs in general. Venturi expressed regret that his Prince­ton build­ings were con­tro­ver­sial, but also defended them:
To me it’s kind of sad, because we were con­sid­ered out­ra­geous archi­tec­tural thinkers and archi­tects when I was young, and now prac­ti­cally every­one is doing what we’ve said. Now that doesn’t mean that if you’re con­tro­ver­sial, you’re good. You just have to do your best at any moment, and hope that peo­ple will like it. I feel sad — I feel very sad about this (con­tro­versy), but on the other hand we did the best we could. I feel sad because I don’t like to make it hard for the peo­ple who put their faith in us, the trustees. So I feel sad about that, but on the other hand I think what we’ve done is good, and maybe soon peo­ple will come around, and what we’ve done will be con­sid­ered more or less ordi­nary or in the mainstream.
Appar­ently the peo­ple at Prince­ton who had put their faith in Ven­turi were not overly trou­bled by the con­tro­versy his build­ings cre­ated. To date, his firm has designed five projects on cam­pus: Wu Hall (1983), Lewis Thomas Lab­o­ra­tory (1986), Fisher and Bend­heim Halls (1990), Schultz Lab­o­ra­tory (1993) and Frist Cam­pus Cen­ter (2000), as well as por­tions of the Prince­ton Club of New York(1990 and 1991).

– Christie Peter­son, Uni­ver­sity Archives Project Archivist

This VHS video is part of the Uni­ver­sity Archives’ His­tor­i­cal Audio­vi­sual Col­lec­tion (item no. 1327). Images are taken from this film.

You must log in to post a comment.