She Flourishes:” Chapters in the History of Princeton Women.

Mudd Man­u­script Library’s new exhi­bi­tion fea­tures women at Prince­ton, from the days of Eve­lyn Col­lege (1887–1897), mainly attended by daugh­ters of Prince­ton Uni­ver­sity and Prince­ton The­o­log­i­cal Sem­i­nary pro­fes­sors, to the appoint­ment of Shirley Tilgh­man as the first woman pres­i­dent of Prince­ton Uni­ver­sity in 2001. For the first time our exhibit is accom­pa­nied by his­tor­i­cal film footage from the archives. This com­pi­la­tion of seg­ments from films and videos, most of which was fea­tured pre­vi­ously in The Reel Mudd, is shown here.

The footage cov­ers forty years of his­tory of Prince­ton women, from the admis­sion of Sabra Meser­vey as the first woman at the Grad­u­ate School in 1961 to Shirley Tilghman’s pres­i­dency. Sub­jects cov­ered include the intro­duc­tion of coed­u­a­tion, stu­dent activism and Sally Frank, and activ­i­ties of the Women’s Cen­ter and SHARE (Sex­ual Harassment/Assault Advis­ing, Resources, and Education).

The com­pi­la­tion opens with footage of the Class of 1939’s junior prom in 1938 (taken from its Class film), which was attended by 606 women (all listed by name in the Daily Prince). Women only entered aca­d­e­mic life at Prince­ton in 1961, when Sabra Meser­vey was admit­ted at to the Grad­u­ate School. The footage at 0:37 shows Meservey’s humor­ous account of her ini­tial con­ver­sa­tion with Pres­i­dent Robert Goheen, who ulti­mately over­saw the intro­duc­tion of under­grad­u­ate coed­u­ca­tion in 1969, and wanted to use Meser­vey as a “test case” at the Grad­u­ate School. (For the full story, see the the blog about the Cel­e­bra­tion of Coed­u­ca­tion at the Grad­u­ate School.)

The only filmed rec­ol­lec­tions about the early years of coed­u­ca­tion were found on the doc­u­men­tary Look­ing Back: Reflec­tions of Black Prince­ton Alumni (1:32), cre­ated on the occa­sion of Princeton’s 250th anniver­sary in 1996. The changes on cam­pus did not please every­body. In 1974 Prince­ton icon Fred­er­ick Fox ’39 reached out to dis­grun­tled alumni in the film A Walk in the Spring­time, point­ing out, per­haps tongue in cheek, that Nas­sau Hall’s two bronze tigers were male and female (3:19). In the fol­low­ing frag­ment, taken from the short Acad­emy award win­ning film Prince­ton, A Search For Answers (1973), women fea­ture promi­nently (3:55).

The last frag­ments fea­ture woman activism and the gains of the women’s move­ment of the 1970s and the 1980s. Two frag­ments were taken from the Class of 1986’s Video Year­book: a speech from Sally Frank ’80, who sued the last three all-male eat­ing clubs (4:18), and a Women’s Cen­ter sit-in in May 1, 1986 (4:45). The last two frag­ments have not been fea­tured yet in The Reel Mudd but will be shortly. The first is a sketch from “Sex on a Sat­ur­day Night,” a the­ater per­for­mance for fresh­men about sex­ual harass­ment, pre­sented by SHARE (5:11), The film ends with the inau­gu­ra­tion of Shirley Tilgh­man (5:11) in 2001, taken from the doc­u­men­tary “Robert F. Goheen ’40, *48; Reflec­tions of a Pres­i­dent” (2006).

The exhibit “She Flour­ishes:” Chap­ters in the His­tory of Prince­ton Women may be vis­ited dur­ing Mudd Library’s open­ing hours on week­days between 9.00 am and 4.45 pm. from now until the end of August 2012.

Princeton: A Search for Answers,” 1973

Dur­ing a morn­ing ses­sion of the President’s Con­fer­ence in the early 1970s, a mem­ber of the stu­dent panel told the assem­bled alumni that she had come to Prince­ton “not to find a way of mak­ing a liv­ing, but instead to find a way of mak­ing a life.” Film­mak­ers Julian Krainin and DeWitt Sage used this state­ment in their pro­posal in 1972 for a new recruit­ment film for Prince­ton Uni­ver­sity. “It seems that it should be the respon­si­bil­ity of a great uni­ver­sity not so much to answer the ques­tion of how to “make a life,” but to present the stu­dent with at least the tools and courage with which he or she might dis­cover the answer.”

The result­ing film Prince­ton: A Search for Answers won an Oscar  in 1974 for Doc­u­men­tary Short Sub­ject. Film pro­ducer and direc­tor Joshua Logan ’31, who had started his stage writ­ing and direct­ing career in Princeton’s Tri­an­gle Club, was one of the first to see it. “I not only believe that it is a mov­ing, funny, and stim­u­lat­ing account of a Uni­ver­sity I once knew but had almost for­got­ten,”  he wrote to his fel­low mem­bers of the Acad­emy. “It tells about the gleam that flits across the human mind and gives us all some­thing to hope for, to live for. It makes the human race quite a bit more respectable then (sic) we have recently thought it to be.” The film which has recently been remas­tered (2013) is fea­tured here.

In order to write the film treat­ment and script, Dewitt Sage spent sev­eral months on cam­pus, attend­ing classes and sem­i­nars, and talk­ing with stu­dents, fac­ulty and staff. Once the film treat­ment was approved, Julian Krainin took over to super­vise the actual cam­era work. Dur­ing 1972 and early 1973 four­teen and a half hours of 16mm color footage was shot for the thirty minute film. The out­takes are kept in the Uni­ver­sity Archives. To accom­pany the film, the Office of Com­mu­ni­ca­tions pro­duced a hand­some brochure with quotes and infor­ma­tion about the fac­ulty fea­tured (see SearchForAnswers.pdf).

As already sug­gested by the title, the film’s main empha­sis is on edu­ca­tion, schol­ar­ship, and student-instructor rela­tions. The film includes footage of tuto­ri­als and lec­tures by physics pro­fes­sor and Dean of the Fac­ulty Aaron Lemon­ick (1:50, 9:11), and pro­fes­sors Edward Cone (Music, 3:01, 29:48), John Wheeler (Physics 7:05), Daniel Seltzer (Eng­lish, 12:39), and Ann Dou­glas Wood (Eng­lish, 25:02). Wheeler is filmed dur­ing a lec­ture about the impli­ca­tions of black holes (he is cred­ited with coin­ing the phrase in 1967), while Dan Seltzer teaches a Shake­speare act­ing class and lec­tures about Henry IV (Part 2). Addi­tional footage fea­tures Prince­ton pres­i­dent William Bowen dur­ing a ques­tion and answer ses­sion with alumni and under­grad­u­ates (9:55, 26:11, 27:49) and the work of two grad­u­ate stu­dents: Niall O’Murchadha (Physics, 5:10, 26:51) and Maury Wolfe (Archi­tec­ture, 16:11).

Pro­duced only a few years after the intro­duc­tion of co-education in 1969, at a time when diver­si­fi­ca­tion of the stu­dent body was a pri­or­ity for Prince­ton, women and African Amer­i­can stu­dents fea­ture promi­nently in cam­pus scenes (9:40, 20:56, 24:36) and in the class rooms. There is lit­tle empha­sis in the film on extracur­ric­u­lar activ­i­ties. In addi­tion to footage of the Glee Club singing Bach in Alexan­der Hall (directed by Pro­fes­sor of Music Wal­ter Noll­ner, 17:47), sport scenes are lim­ited to marathon run­ning and row­ing (23:25). Addi­tional footage includes stu­dents shar­ing their views of Prince­ton in a pub (19:45, the legal drink­ing age was still eigh­teen!) Some his­tor­i­cal pho­tographs and footage is shown at 22:27, includ­ing a frag­ment of a chem­istry lec­ture by the famous Hubert Alyea (pre­vi­ously fea­tured) and the Tri­an­gle Club.

Con­tinue read­ing

Being Jewish at Princeton: from F. Scott Fitzgerald’s days to the Center of Jewish Life

The Prince­ton of today is not the Prince­ton of Scott Fitzger­ald. And by that I mean you can feel com­fort­able being Jew­ish, you can feel com­fort­able being Asian, you can feel com­fort­able being African Amer­i­can. And while this might not always have been true (…) it is def­i­nitely true today.” The speaker is Erik Ruben ’98 (1:46), one of the stu­dents fea­tured in the pro­mo­tional video below about the Cen­ter for Jew­ish Life, which opened in 1993. Today’s entry takes a brief look at the his­tory of the admis­sion of Jew­ish stu­dents at Prince­ton since the 1920s.

F. Scott Fitzger­ald’s 1920 debut novel, This Side of Par­adise, was set at Prince­ton and reflected the atmos­phere of the eat­ing clubs and of the uni­ver­sity itself, which (not to Princeton’s lik­ing) he described as “the pleas­an­test coun­try club in America.” Fitzgerald wrote his book at a time when some north­east­ern col­leges and uni­ver­si­ties, par­tic­u­larly in urban areas where many East­ern Euro­pean Jew­ish immi­grants had set­tled, per­ceived they had a “Jew­ish prob­lem” in that if they admit­ted too many Jew­ish stu­dents, Protes­tant mid­dle and upper class stu­dents would be dri­ven away. Colum­bia, which had the largest Jew­ish enroll­ment at 40%, was the first to impose a quota in 1921. Prince­ton, how­ever, always claimed not to use quo­tas. As late as 1948 Rad­cliffe Heer­mance, Princeton’s first direc­tor of admis­sions from 1922 to 1950, vehe­mently denied a claim that Prince­ton used a quota to keep Jew­ish stu­dents under 4%. “We’ve never had a quota sys­tem, we don’t have a quota sys­tem, we will never have a quota sys­tem” he told the Daily Prince­ton­ian.

Hutchins121770.jpgA let­ter from for­mer Uni­ver­sity of Chicago pres­i­dent Robert Hutchins, who vis­ited Prince­ton Pres­i­dent John Grier Hibben in the early 1930s, indi­cated oth­er­wise. Hutchins wrote Prince­ton senior Steven L. Buen­ning ’71 In Decem­ber 1970, as Buen­ning was seek­ing infor­ma­tion for his senior the­sis, a biog­ra­phy about Hibben. In the let­ter Hutchins recalls how he had asked Hibben about the num­ber of Jew­ish stu­dents at Prince­ton. Accord­ing to Hutchins, Hibben claimed that the num­ber just hap­pened, where­upon his wife exclaimed: “Jack Hibben, I don’t see how you can sit there and lie to this young man. You know very well that you and Dean Eisen­hart get together every year and fix the quota.”
This anec­dote has been quoted in sev­eral books, and in their foot­notes the authors refer to Buenning’s the­sis only, which includes quotes from the let­ter. Above we repro­duce the orig­i­nal let­ter, which is found in Hibben’s pres­i­den­tial papers in the Office of the Pres­i­dent Records (AC117, Series 14, Box 65, folder 6). The first para­graph, in which Hutchins recalls Hibben’s pro­fessed igno­rance about the rea­sons why black stu­dents did not come to Prince­ton, is remark­able in itself. Unlike Yale and Har­vard, Prince­ton did not admit African Amer­i­can stu­dents  until World War II (the first four African Amer­i­cans were in the Navy V-12 pro­gram).  For more infor­ma­tion about African Amer­i­can stu­dents at Prince­ton, see our pre­vi­ous blog.

Heer­mance lim­ited Jew­ish enroll­ment by devel­op­ing an admis­sion pol­icy that put an empha­sis on “char­ac­ter,” which, how­ever sub­jec­tive, was still regarded as defen­si­ble in pub­lic. Cri­te­ria like “man­hood,” “lead­er­ship” “par­tic­i­pa­tion in ath­let­ics” and “home envi­ron­ment and com­pan­ions” were assessed by using inter­views, let­ters of rec­om­men­da­tion, and a social rank­ing sys­tem. A pow­er­ful dis­in­cen­tive to even apply was the anti-Semitic rep­u­ta­tion of Princeton’s eat­ing clubs, which con­sid­ered most Jews “unclubbable.”

Con­tinue read­ing

A lesson for fundraisers: the solicitation process for “A Campaign for Princeton,” 1982

In a pre­vi­ous blog we dis­cussed the three-year $53 Mil­lion Cam­paign, launched at the begin­ning of Robert’s Goheen’s pres­i­dency in 1959. On an even larger scale was the five-year fundrais­ing cam­paign that was launched on Feb­ru­ary 19, 1982 dur­ing the pres­i­dency of Goheen’s suc­ces­sor William G. Bowen. The goal for “A Cam­paign for Prince­ton” was set at $275 mil­lion (raised to $330 mil­lion in Jan­u­ary 1984). Three years into the cam­paign, the fund drive ran like a “well-oiled machine,” accord­ing to the Daily Prince­ton­ian, bring­ing in more than $1 mil­lion a week. Fifty-five pro­fes­sion­als worked with a body of 2.500 alumni vol­un­teers, spread over sev­en­teen regions, who were trained to ask fel­low alumni to give at their max­i­mum capac­ity. Fea­tured here is “You Ask For It: An Intro­duc­tion to Cam­paign Solicitation,” an instruc­tional film that, how­ever much a prod­uct of the 1980s, may still be of inter­est for today’s fundraisers.

The cam­paign goals were sum­ma­rized in a Cam­paign Primer, pub­lished at the launch of the cam­paign. A full list and descrip­tion of the goals, which included aca­d­e­mic pro­grams, facil­i­ties, stu­dent aid, and res­i­den­tial col­leges, can be found at  CampaignPrimer.pdf.

Alumni solic­i­tors pre­pared to “make an ask” to prospec­tive donors with the help of a writ­ten solic­i­ta­tion plan, pro­vided by Princeton’s cam­paign staff. The solic­i­ta­tion plan, accord­ing to the Vol­un­teer Hand­book, con­tained par­tic­u­lar infor­ma­tion about the “prospect” as well as spe­cific guide­lines on how to work with the per­son to “help ensure max­i­mum giv­ing.”  For the first time in Princeton’s fundrais­ing his­tory, alumni with cap­i­tal gift poten­tial were asked to make one sin­gle com­mit­ment to the cam­paign that included both Annual Giv­ing (AG) and a cap­i­tal gift (this was known as a “joint ask”). As the cam­paign was spread over five years, it allowed for all alumni to be addressed with their class’ major reunion goals in mind.

Solic­i­tors were not meant  to be bash­ful about their “ask.” Out­right gifts of cash or assets (gen­er­ally secu­ri­ties) were first pri­or­ity, accord­ing to the Vol­un­teer Hand­book, but if that was a prob­lem, other char­i­ta­ble tax plan­ning tech­niques were encour­aged. “If you are per­suaded that a donor sim­ply can­not meet the requested level through an out­right gift, you should then intro­duce Planned Giv­ing to the nego­ti­a­tion.” Since these tech­niques were rather sophis­ti­cated, fur­ther nego­ti­a­tions were referred to Princeton’s Planned Giv­ing staff.

The above VHS video fea­tures two alumni ‘novices’ to the solic­it­ing process, who ask an expe­ri­enced alum­nus named Jim, a regional chair­man in charge of Major Gifts, in a staged inter­view for advice. The woman in the film is in charge of “Spe­cial Gifts” for her Class’ 10th Reunion, and the male novice alum­nus is asked to solicit money for a large cap­i­tal gift from a man who never donated more than $2.500 for Annual Giv­ing. The film lets Jim go back in his­tory, show­ing one failed solic­it­ing attempt at the begin­ning of his career, because he was not well enough pre­pared (1:05). This is fol­lowed by his account of one recent suc­cess­ful attempt, in which an alum­nus ended up giv­ing much more than he ini­tially thought he could man­age, par­tially through Planned Giv­ing (5:03).

Although the Uni­ver­sity Archives con­tain a lot of infor­ma­tion about the cam­paign itself, infor­ma­tion about the VHS film fea­tured here is lack­ing. In the lists of Regional Chair­men Major Gifts, pro­vided in the Vol­un­teer Hand­book, there is no James or Jim, hence the peo­ple in the staged inter­view may not be actual alumni. If you can pro­vide more infor­ma­tion about the mak­ing of the film, please let us know!

For more infor­ma­tion on the cam­paign itself, see The Story of A Cam­paign for Prince­ton, 1981–1986 by William McCleery.

This VHS video is part of the Uni­ver­sity Archives’ His­tor­i­cal Audio­vi­sual Col­lec­tion (Item no. 1422)

Post-War Princeton: The building of Firestone Library, the Dillon Gym, and Bicentennial celebrations, 1945–1949

From the start of the Depres­sion until the end of World War II, con­struc­tion activ­ity at Prince­ton, like at other uni­ver­si­ties, was at a near stand­still. The first build­ings to be erected here as part of the post-war build­ing boom on Amer­i­can cam­puses were the Dil­lon Gym and the Har­vey S. Fire­stone Memo­r­ial Library. The four silent films dis­cussed on this post, which are all in color, cap­ture the begin­ning of the con­struc­tion of Fire­stone Library, the ded­i­ca­tion of the Dil­lon Gym in June 1947, and other activ­i­ties at the close of the bicen­ten­nial cel­e­bra­tions of 1946–1947 and the imme­di­ate years thereafter.

The ori­gin of the 16mm film that is fea­tured here is unknown. Although it seems excru­ci­at­ingly slow at times, the 14 minute long time lapse footage spans almost one and a half years, dur­ing which the exca­va­tion work for Fire­stone Library was under­taken, the struc­ture of the three under­ground floors almost com­pleted, and the steel struc­ture of the upper part of the library erected.

Firestone ground.jpgAs can be seen on this cam­pus map, the space between Wash­ing­ton Road and the then library (what is now Chan­cel­lor Green and Pyne Hall) was quite open. Dur­ing most of the film the cam­era is fac­ing the Engi­neer­ing Build­ing on Wash­ing­ton Road (now Burr and Green Hall), and moves between the Joseph Henry House, home of the Dean of the Col­lege (the white house seen on the left) and the ’77 Lab­o­ra­tory (the square brick build­ing with the cres­cent shaped win­dows on the right). This biol­ogy lab­o­ra­tory, donated by the Class of 1877 at its tenth reunion, was demol­ished in the sum­mer of 1946, which is cap­tured start­ing at 9:15. The ’77 Lab appears as a pile of rub­ble at 9:21, when the Bracket Dynamo Lab­o­ra­tory behind it becomes vis­i­ble. This sec­ond lab is grad­u­ally bro­ken down in the footage that follows.

The Joseph Henry House, how­ever, was not destroyed but moved instead, for the third time since it was built in 1837. Although the cam­era focused on the exca­va­tion work, prepa­ra­tions for the move to its present loca­tion, which accord­ing to the Prince started in April 1946, can be fol­lowed from 8:40 at the top of the screen. The actual move took place at the end of May, and the house can be seen to have moved a few yards between 9:45 and 9:48. Most of the footage con­cerns the dig­ging and exca­va­tion work prior to the con­struc­tion work, which had started on Christ­mas Eve 1945, and was sub­con­tracted to George M. Brew­ster and Sons (Turner Con­struc­tion Com­pany was the con­trac­tor). The work of Brewster’s “blast­ing crew,” which accord­ing to the Prince in March con­sisted of a “blast expert,” a “pow­der mon­key” and twelve drillers, can be fol­lowed from 3:28, with two explo­sions vis­i­ble at 4:35 and 6:48.

Only the last few min­utes of the film (10:39–14.15), cap­ture the begin­ning of the con­struc­tion of the Fire­stone Library itself, start­ing with the low­est floor. The snow at 11.31, sur­round­ing the con­crete columns, indi­cates that a year has passed since the time lapse film­ing began. On Jan­u­ary 15, 1947 the Prince wrote that most of the under­ground struc­ture had been com­pleted. The footage at 11.53, which includes a view on Nas­sau Street, must have been filmed dur­ing or shortly after Feb­ru­ary 1947, when the library, accord­ing to the Prince had risen above the ground. The film ends with footage of the build­ing of the steel struc­ture of the library’s three floors (13:11), the last shots of which indi­cat­ing that it is spring­time now (13:32).

Con­tinue read­ing

Princeton’s Bicentennial: Charter Day, October 19, 1946

In the 1946–1947 aca­d­e­mic year, Prince­ton cel­e­brated its 200th anniver­sary with a series of con­vo­ca­tions and events, end­ing with a con­clud­ing cer­e­mony, cap­tured in a news­reel, which included a con­vo­ca­tion address by US Pres­i­dent Harry Tru­man. Today’s blog fea­tures another news­reel about the University’s bicen­ten­nial year that focuses on “Char­ter Day,” Octo­ber 19, 1946. In addi­tion to Princeton’s almost 200-year old char­ter and the “largest pro­ces­sion in Prince­ton his­tory” at the time (which included 23 hon­orary degrees recip­i­ents), the news­reel addresses the begin­ning of inter­col­le­giate foot­ball, depict­ing a re-enactment of the first foot­ball game between Prince­ton and Rut­gers from Novem­ber 6, 1869 dur­ing half­time of the 1946 Princeton-Rutgers game.

Princeton’s char­ter, granted to the Uni­ver­sity on Octo­ber 22, 1746 (then still known as the “Col­lege of New Jer­sey”) is shown fleet­ingly in the news­reel (0:38). Read­ers of our reg­u­lar blog already know that the char­ter, on inter­mit­tent dis­play dur­ing the cel­e­bra­tion of Mudd Man­u­script Library’s 50th anniver­sary, is actu­ally not the orig­i­nal (which was lost) but the sec­ond char­ter, drawn up in 1748. (An expla­na­tion can be found in our Fre­quently Asked Ques­tions.) The famous early pic­ture of Nas­sau Hall that fol­lows at 0:48 is the cop­per engrav­ing by Philadel­phia artist Henry Dawkins (copied from a draw­ing by Prince­ton stu­dent William Ten­nent, Class of 1758), which was printed in Samuel Blair’s Account of the Col­lege of New Jer­sey (1764). For more infor­ma­tion about the engraver, who was also a coun­ter­feiter of paper money, see Julie Mellby’s Graphic Arts blog.

Over 500 peo­ple com­prised the aca­d­e­mic pro­ces­sion that opened and closed the morning’s con­vo­ca­tion, accord­ing to the Prince, includ­ing fac­ulty, trustees, rep­re­sen­ta­tives of all alumni classes and mem­bers of the Under­grad­u­ate Coun­cil. The pro­ces­sion included an offi­cial del­e­ga­tion from the United Nations, headed by Sec­re­tary Gen­eral Trygve Lie, and mem­bers from the State Bicen­ten­nial Com­mis­sion, includ­ing Wal­ter E. Edge, Gov­er­nor of New Jer­sey. Lie (1:42) and Edge (2:11) were among the 23 hon­orary degree recip­i­ents, as were the Dan­ish physi­cist Niels Bohr, the Span­ish writer Sal­vador De Madariaga, and the French philoso­pher Jacques Mar­i­tain (2:21–not all recip­i­ents are clearly visible).

The last eight min­utes of the news­reel are occu­pied by the 38th Rutgers-Princeton foot­ball game in the after­noon (2:47), with a humor­ous reen­act­ment of the first Rutgers-Princeton game of Novem­ber 6, 1869 (5:51), con­sid­ered the ‘birth’ of inter­col­le­giate foot­ball. A descrip­tion of the foot­ball game and the reen­act­ment by The­atre Intime and mem­bers of the Rut­gers soc­cer team can be found in the Prince. A copy of the pro­gram notes about the 1869 foot­ball game, with an expla­na­tion of the rules, may be down­loaded at Twenty-four Stal­wart Men.pdf. A sec­ond arti­cle from the pro­gram, sum­ma­riz­ing the his­tory of the Princeton-Rutgers foot­ball rivalry, can be viewed at  77 Years Princeton-Rutgers.pdf. More infor­ma­tion about early foot­ball can be found in Foot­ball: the Ivy League Ori­gins of an Amer­i­can Obses­sion by Mark Bern­stein ’83, who wrote our pre­vi­ous blog entry.

The footage on this 16mm film is part of the Uni­ver­sity Archives’ His­tor­i­cal Audio­vi­sual Col­lec­tion (part of item no. 0092).

Princeton traditions, old and new: the Class of 1986’s “video yearbook”

The Class of 1986 was a ‘his­toric’ class, so the fresh­men were told: they were the first to begin their Prince­ton years in the new social sys­tem of the res­i­den­tial col­leges. Accord­ing to their Class His­tory in the Nas­sau Her­ald, how­ever, the stu­dents car­ried on as the gen­er­a­tions before them. “We worked hard and we par­tied hard. This blend of con­ti­nu­ity and change, of tra­di­tion and tran­si­tion, would char­ac­ter­ize our four year stay at Old Nas­sau.” The ‘video year­book’ fea­tured here, in itself a reminder of the “class films” of the 1920s and 1930s, is an expres­sion of that expe­ri­ence. A fast-paced arrange­ment of video­taped snip­pets cap­tur­ing cam­pus events and stu­dent life, the 26 minute film is a cel­e­bra­tion of both old and new.

The video year­book, pro­duced by “Ground Floor Video,” a group of stu­dents under the direc­tion of Glenn Picher ’86, was filmed dur­ing the class’ junior and senior year. Meant as a com­ple­ment to the print year­book, accord­ing to the Prince, the film con­tains selec­tions from some thirty to forty hours of video­tape, accom­pa­nied by orig­i­nal music com­posed by Peter Cur­tiss ’86 (other music cred­its can be found at 25:55). The film is divided into seven chap­ters: Stu­dent Life (1:03), Aca­d­e­mics (5:33), Sports (7:08), Hol­i­days (10:39), Cam­pus issues (15:09), Spring (17:15), and Grad­u­a­tion week­end (20:50).

The sports and spring scenes, along with the Grad­u­a­tion week­end events were already tra­di­tional ele­ments in the class films of the 1920s. Incom­ing fresh­men were intro­duced to other Prince­ton tra­di­tions in the Spe­cial Class of 1986 issue of the Daily Prince­ton­ian. Some of those tra­di­tions are cap­tured in the “video year­book” fea­tured here. They include the bon­fire on Can­non Green after a major sports victory–in this case the foot­ball team’s “Big Three Title,” the first since 1967 (9:44, com­pare with the bon­fire of the Class of 1923); House Par­ties (19:29; com­pare with the class film of the Class of 1939); and “Arch Sing” (12:48), rem­i­nis­cent of the tra­di­tion of “Senior Singing” as seen in the Class of 1928 footage. The footage in the  “Grad­u­a­tion Week­end” (20:50), cap­tur­ing the P-rade, the break­ing of the pipes on Can­non Green, and the com­mence­ment cer­e­monies is very sim­i­lar to the films from six decades pre­vi­ous depict­ing the grad­u­a­tion of the Classes of 1921 and 1928.

Addi­tion­ally, more recent tra­di­tions fea­tured here include the “Nude Olympics (12:00), and the party activ­i­ties of “blow pong” (3:35 and 4:47), and what is assumed to be the “Trees and Trolls,” the annual rum­ble between the over 6 ft tall and the shorter mem­bers of the then still all-male eat­ing club, the Tiger Inn (4:23). Both activ­i­ties were accom­pa­nied by copi­ous amounts of beer. Dur­ing 1986’s fresh­men year the drink­ing age was raised from 18 to 21, mak­ing senior year the first year that most stu­dents could legally drink alcohol.

Of par­tic­u­lar inter­est for the topic of “tra­di­tions” is the address of Sally Frank ’80 at the Woodrow Wil­son School on Novem­ber 20, 1985 (16:28). Ear­lier that year, Sally Frank had won her law­suit against the all-male eat­ing clubs of Cot­tage, Ivy, and Tiger Inn, which she had filed in 1979 after they refused her a chance to bicker due to her gen­der. Addi­tional issues addressed in the sec­tion ‘Cam­pus protests’ include the block­ade of the entrance to Nas­sau Hall on May 23, 1985 to protest Princeton’s  invest­ments poli­cies with respect to South Africa (15:09) and the Women’s Cen­ter sit-in of May 1, 1986 (16:52).

Within the video a few other faces have been iden­ti­fied as the following.

  • Eng­lish pro­fes­sor John Flem­ing is shown lec­tur­ing (5:39)
  • The late art his­to­rian John R. Mar­tin (5:56)
  • Pres­i­dent Bill Bowen (6:32, appears again 19:05).
  • The late art pro­fes­sor Jerry Buchanan cri­tiques a student’s work (5:42).
  • Harold Med­ina ’09 is seen rid­ing in a golf cart (21:20)
  • Dr. Ruth Wes­t­heimer makes a brief appear­ance (22:41)

This VHS tape is part of the Uni­ver­sity Archives’ His­tor­i­cal Audio­vi­sual Col­lec­tion (item no. 1324).

Moving Corwin Hall 100 feet, May 20, 1963

Robert­son Hall, the build­ing that cur­rently houses the Woodrow Wil­son School of Pub­lic and Inter­na­tional Affairs (WWSPIA) has been fea­tured in two news­reels: the “Prince­ton news­reel” of 1961, announc­ing the, at the time anony­mous, $35 mil­lion gift of Charles S. Robert­son ’26 and his wife, Marie; and the 1966 news­reel about Pres­i­dent Lyn­don Johnson’s visit to ded­i­cate the build­ing. This post fea­tures the build­ing that orig­i­nally housed the Woodrow Wil­son School: Cor­win Hall, erected in 1951 and orig­i­nally known as “Wil­son Hall,” which had to be moved 100 feet to make way for the new WWSPIA facility.

The spec­tac­u­lar move of the build­ing to its present site between Wal­lace and Robert­son Hall was recorded via time lapse film­ing on an 8mm cam­era by Lawrence l. Rauch *49, who donated the footage to the Prince­ton Uni­ver­sity Archives. The engi­neer­ing feat was accom­plished by the New York firm of Spencer, White, and Pren­tiss, using hydraulic jacks to push the build­ing along twelve steel tracks. The actual mov­ing took only twelve hours but two months were needed to pre­pare for it and another three months to secure the build­ing to its new foundation.

When Robert­son Hall was com­pleted in 1965, Wil­son Hall was re-assigned to one of WWSPIA’s chief allies, the Depart­ment of Pol­i­tics, and to the Cen­ter of Inter­na­tional Stud­ies. Its name was changed to Cor­win Hall, in honor of Edward S. Cor­win, the first chair­man of the Depart­ment of Pol­i­tics and the long-time holder of the McCormick Pro­fes­sor­ship of Jurispru­dence, the pro­fes­sor­ship orig­i­nally held by Woodrow Wilson.

This 8mm film, a gift from Lawrence L. Rauch *49, is part of the Prince­ton Uni­ver­sity Archives’ His­tor­i­cal Audio­vi­sual Col­lec­tion (item no. 1980). Adapted from the post by John DeLooper in Mudd Man­u­script Library’s Blog with excerpts from Alexan­der Leitch A Prince­ton Com­pan­ion (Prince­ton Uni­ver­sity Press, 1978).  

Commencement and reunions in 1928, and Princeton’s penultimate flour picture

In a recent blog we shared our old­est film depict­ing Pres­i­dent Hibben’s inau­gu­ra­tion in 1912 and some unex­pected footage of Woodrow Wil­son. In today’s post we show you more sur­prise footage from that reel: com­mence­ment activ­i­ties and P-rade scenes, most of which we had already found in a puz­zling “film mosaic” on another reel. We now have iden­ti­fied the mys­tery footage as scenes from the class films of the Class of 1928. The footage from both reels is fea­tured here, along with two reunion films that helped date the mate­ri­als. Together the four films cap­ture the com­mence­ment and reunion week­end of 1928, which included a par­tic­u­larly spec­tac­u­lar P-rade, when many classes were, accord­ing to the Prince, “decked in gaudy and grotesque costumes.”

As a bonus there is footage of the Class of 1928’s fresh­men ‘flour pic­ture’ from 1924–the first in many years in which only water and flour were used, which appar­ently made this haz­ing tra­di­tion too tame to survive–it was abol­ished in 1926.

Accord­ing to the list of class films in the records of the Grad­u­ate Coun­cil, the Class of 1928 had three  film reels cap­tur­ing their com­mence­ment, with some of the footage sim­i­lar to the grad­u­a­tion film of the Class of 1921. The footage fea­tured here con­tains only a few scenes, with­out the titles that orig­i­nally accom­pa­nied them. The film, which is not in chrono­log­i­cal order, opens at the end of the class exer­cises on Mon­day, June 18 with the break­ing of the pipes on Can­non Green, which sym­bol­ized the break­ing of ties with under­grad­u­ate life. The footage is fol­lowed at 0:22 by the com­mence­ment exer­cises on Tues­day, June 19, end­ing with the singing of “Old Nas­sau” (0:44).

1928gradsx.jpgThe film con­tin­ues on Sat­ur­day, June 16 in front of Nas­sau Hall (0:54), where all alumni were wait­ing for the Class of 1928 to lead the P-rade. After the arrival of the 466 grad­u­at­ing seniors, car­ry­ing white umbrel­las (1:04, left), the other classes would join in, begin­ning with the youngest. The footage at 1:16 shows var­i­ous classes com­ing through the Arch at Prospect Avenue, from where the pro­ces­sion pro­ceeded to Uni­ver­sity field.

FoxHunt2x.jpgFrom 1:30 the pro­ces­sion is seen march­ing around the base­ball field, prior to the tra­di­tional game against Yale. The cam­era­man zoomed in on classes with par­tic­u­larly inter­est­ing cos­tumes. These include what is thought to be the Class of 1918 with feather hats (1:39), and an unknown class (pos­si­bly the Class of 1912) act­ing out a fox hunt (1:59, right). The film ends with footage of pre­sum­ably the Class of 1928’s last Senior Singing on the steps of Nas­sau Hall (2:19), with the seniors tra­di­tion­ally dressed in white.

Con­tinue read­ing

Triangle’s “All in Favor”, 1948–1949

It is always dif­fi­cult to watch silent films of early Tri­an­gle shows, which are as famous for their music and witty lyrics as for the all male kick­lines (read our pre­vi­ous blog for an intro­duc­tion). Even with­out sound, how­ever, the films of All In Favor are still a visual treat. Footage of the per­for­mance, a daz­zling dis­play of vir­tu­os­ity and color, is alter­nated with dress­ing rooms scenes, dis­play­ing the fun of stock­ings, wigs, and long flow­ing skirts.

All in Favor, is, in Triangle’s own words, a “fast-moving musi­cal com­edy satire on Amer­i­can pol­i­tics, its meth­ods and mad­ness,” set in a lit­tle town in Indi­ana in the 1920s, where a mayor is run­ning for reelec­tion with the help of  his “non-too-honest” cam­paign man­ager. His oppo­nent is the reform can­di­date widow Dawes, whose daugh­ter dates a Prince­ton stu­dent  (a sum­mary of the story, taken from the press release, can be found in the Daily Prince­ton­ian). The script was writ­ten by Tri­an­gle pres­i­dent Fran­cis S. Hart­ley ’50 (pic­tured at 0:16), vice-president Thomas H. Mid­dle­ton ’48, sec­re­tary Kennedy Williams ’48 and Edward H. Tuck ’49.

HenryFonda_JamesNeely.jpgThe first of the two films, which includes excerpts from Act I, opens with prepa­ra­tions prior to the show, includ­ing dress­ing room scenes and orches­tra prac­tice (0:18–2:10). Although some of the footage on the stage includes singing and act­ing, the two films merely cap­ture the 16-man Tri­an­gle cho­rus, per­form­ing spe­cialty dances and pro­duc­tion num­bers cre­ated by chore­o­g­ra­pher Mor­gan Lewis. In Act I this includes the Can-Can shown at 4:42. The photo at the right, which was found in the Tri­an­gle Club Records, shows film star Henry Fonda, adjust­ing the garter of cho­rus leader James C. Neely ’48. Although Fonda attended one of Triangle’s rehearsals, he is not included in the films fea­tured here.

The film ends with the min­strel show at the mayor’s cam­paign rally (7:38), a par­tic­u­lar nov­elty that received a lot of attention.

The sec­ond film, which cap­tures Act II of the per­for­mance, opens with a mem­ber of the cho­rus (a “chorine”) pulling on stock­ings, which is fol­lowed by a pris­oner escape (0:27) and chorines danc­ing the Charleston (1:24). A tra­di­tional bal­let, pre­ceded by another dress-up scene, is shown at 3:40. When the cur­tain falls, the casts sings the Prince­ton alma mater “Old Nas­sau” (7:17).

Exist­ing pho­tographs of the per­for­mance did not allow us to iden­tify indi­vid­ual actors and cho­rus mem­bers. If any­one is able to add names to the faces on these films, please com­ment on this blog!

These 16mm films are part of the Tri­an­gle Club Records at the Prince­ton Uni­ver­sity Archives (box 177).  Mudd Library is thank­ful for the sup­port that the Tri­an­gle Alumni Board pro­vided for dig­i­tiz­ing these films and unlock­ing their contents.