Spring may come earlier to North American forests (Geophysical Research Letters)

By Cather­ine Zan­donella, Office of the Dean for Research

Trees in the con­ti­nen­tal U.S. could send out new spring leaves up to 17 days ear­lier in the com­ing cen­tury than they did before global tem­per­a­tures started to rise, accord­ing to a new study by Prince­ton Uni­ver­sity researchers. These climate-driven changes could lead to changes in the com­po­si­tion of north­east­ern forests and give a boost to their abil­ity to take up car­bon dioxide.

Trees play an impor­tant role in tak­ing up car­bon diox­ide from the atmos­phere, so researchers led by David Med­vigy, assis­tant pro­fes­sor in Princeton’s depart­ment of geo­sciences, wanted to eval­u­ate pre­dic­tions of spring bud­burst — when decid­u­ous trees push out new growth after months of win­ter dor­mancy — from mod­els that pre­dict how car­bon emis­sions will impact global temperatures.

The date of bud­burst affects how much car­bon diox­ide is taken up each year, yet most cli­mate mod­els have used overly sim­plis­tic schemes for rep­re­sent­ing spring bud­burst, mod­el­ing for exam­ple a sin­gle species of tree to rep­re­sent all the trees in a geo­graphic region.

In 2012, the Prince­ton team pub­lished a new model that relied on warm­ing tem­per­a­tures and the wan­ing num­ber of cold days to pre­dict spring bud­burst. The model, which was pub­lished in the Jour­nal of Geo­phys­i­cal Research, proved accu­rate when com­pared to data on actual bud­burst in the north­east­ern United States.

In the cur­rent paper pub­lished online in Geo­phys­i­cal Research Let­ters, Med­vigy and his col­leagues tested the model against a broader set of obser­va­tions col­lected by the USA National Phe­nol­ogy Net­work, a nation-wide tree ecol­ogy mon­i­tor­ing net­work con­sist­ing of fed­eral agen­cies, edu­ca­tional insti­tu­tions and cit­i­zen sci­en­tists. The team incor­po­rated the 2012 model into pre­dic­tions of future bud­burst based on four pos­si­ble cli­mate sce­nar­ios used in plan­ning exer­cises by the Inter­gov­ern­men­tal Panel on Cli­mate Change.

The researchers included Su-Jong Jeong, a post­doc­toral research asso­ciate in Geo­sciences, along with Elena Shevli­akova, a senior cli­mate mod­eler, and Sergey Maly­shev, a pro­fes­sional spe­cial­ist, both in the Depart­ment of Ecol­ogy and Evo­lu­tion­ary Biol­ogy and asso­ci­ated with the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmos­pheric Administration’s Geo­phys­i­cal Fluid Dynam­ics Laboratory.

The team esti­mated that, com­pared to the late 20th cen­tury, red maple bud­burst will occur 8 to 40 days ear­lier, depend­ing on the part of the coun­try, by the year 2100. They found that the north­ern parts of the United States will have more pro­nounced changes than the south­ern parts, with the largest changes occur­ring in Maine, New York, Michi­gan, and Wisconsin.

The researchers also eval­u­ated how warm­ing tem­per­a­tures could affect the bud­burst date of dif­fer­ent species of tree. They found that bud­burst shifted to ear­lier in the year in both early-budding trees such as com­mon aspen (Pop­u­lus tremu­loides) and late-budding trees such as red maple (Acer rubrum), but that the effect was greater in the late-budding trees and that over time the dif­fer­ences in bud­ding dates narrowed.

The researchers noted that early bud­burst may give decid­u­ous trees, such as oaks and maples, a com­pet­i­tive advan­tage over ever­green trees such as pines and hem­locks. With decid­u­ous trees grow­ing for longer peri­ods of the year, they may begin to out­strip growth of ever­greens, lead­ing to last­ing changes in for­est make-up.

The researchers fur­ther pre­dicted that warm­ing will trig­ger a speed-up of the spring “green­wave,” or bud­burst that moves from south to north across the con­ti­nent dur­ing the spring.

The find­ing is also inter­est­ing from the stand­point of future changes in spring­time weather, said Med­vigy, because bud­burst causes an abrupt change in how quickly energy, water and pol­lu­tants are exchanged between the land and the atmos­phere. Once the leaves come out, energy from the sun is increas­ingly used to evap­o­rate water from the leaves rather than to heat up the sur­face. This can lead to changes in daily tem­per­a­ture ranges, sur­face humid­ity, stream­flow, and even nutri­ent loss from ecosys­tems, accord­ing to Medvigy.

Read the abstract.

Cita­tion:

Jeong, Su-Jong, David Med­vigy, Elena Shevli­akova, and Sergey Maly­shev. 2013. Pre­dict­ing changes in tem­per­ate for­est bud­burst using continental-scale obser­va­tions and mod­els. Geo­phys­i­cal Research Let­ters. Arti­cle first pub­lished online: Jan. 25, 2013. DOI: 10.1029/2012GL054431

This research was sup­ported by award NA08OAR4320752 from the National Oceanic and Atmos­pheric Admin­is­tra­tion, U.S. Depart­ment of Commerce.

Herpes viruses commandeer protein production to storm neurons (Cell Host and Microbe)

By Mor­gan Kelly, Office of Communications

Viruses in the her­pes fam­ily most com­monly found in humans infect ner­vous sys­tem cells by “turn­ing on” and then seiz­ing con­trol of the inter­nal sys­tem these cells rely on to sense injury, among other sig­nal­ing functions.

Prince­ton Uni­ver­sity researchers report in the jour­nal Cell Host and Microbe that the pseudora­bies virus (PRV) — a model her­pes virus that infects ani­mals — ini­ti­ates and com­man­deers pro­tein pro­duc­tion in axons, the long off­shoots of the cell body that con­nect neu­rons to other neu­rons and to tis­sue. After enter­ing the neu­ron at the axon, the virus par­ti­cles — which deliver the viral DNA that infects host cells — use the newly made pro­teins to travel to and infect the cell nucleus. Once there, the infec­tion can spread to other neurons.

The research is the lat­est from the lab­o­ra­tory of senior researcher Lynn Enquist, the Henry L. Hill­man Pro­fes­sor in Mol­e­c­u­lar Biol­ogy, to unravel the puz­zling effi­ciency with which PRV and related her­pes viruses invade the ner­vous sys­tem. PRV is an alpha-herpes virus, a pro­lific her­pes sub­fam­ily that includes her­pes sim­plex virus 1 (HSV-1), an extremely com­mon human virus that causes cold sores and other lesions.

In the cur­rent paper, the researchers write that PRV “clev­erly exploited” a nat­ural cell process to speed up infec­tion, a theme that res­onates in past work from the Enquist lab on alpha-herpes viruses. In 2012, another researcher in the lab reported in Cell Host and Microbe that PRV and HSV-1 infec­tions affect move­ment of neu­ronal mito­chon­dria, the mobile organelles that reg­u­late a cell’s energy sup­ply, com­mu­ni­ca­tion, and self-destruction response to infection.

For this newest research, Enquist worked with lead author Orkide Koyuncu, a post­doc­toral research asso­ciate in mol­e­c­u­lar biol­ogy, and David Perl­man, head of the mol­e­c­u­lar biol­ogy department’s mass spec­trom­e­try facil­ity. They sug­gest that PRV par­ti­cles first repli­cate in non-neuronal (such as skin and other tis­sue) cells at the site of body entry. The par­ti­cles then enter axon ter­mi­nals as the axon car­ries out its reg­u­lar status-reports with those cells. The process of viral-particle entry is sensed by the neu­ron as a dam­age sig­nal, which begins the pro­tein pro­duc­tion that will carry the virus par­ti­cles to the nucleus.

Inter­est­ingly, the researchers dis­cov­ered that the move­ment of incom­ing virus par­ti­cles was dis­rupted by a gen­uine dam­age sig­nal ini­ti­ated before PRV infec­tion. They hypoth­e­sized that the imme­di­ate response spurred by injury, infec­tion or inflam­ma­tion slows down other processes within the axon, which the researchers call “com­pet­i­tive inhi­bi­tion.” When the mol­e­c­u­lar details of this crosstalk are fully under­stood, these sig­nals could be used clin­i­cally to pre­vent the spread of alpha-herpes viruses.

Read the paper.

Cita­tion: Koyuncu, Orkide O., David H. Perl­man, Lynn W. Enquist. 2013. Effi­cient Ret­ro­grade Trans­port of Pseudora­bies Virus within Neu­rons Requires Local Pro­tein Syn­the­sis in Axons. Cell Host & Microbe Vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 54–66.

This work was sup­ported by U.S. National Insti­tutes of Health grant R01NS033506-18.

From dark hearts comes the kindness of mankind (Evolution)

By Mor­gan Kelly, Office of Communications

The kind­ness of mankind most likely devel­oped from our more sin­is­ter and self-serving ten­den­cies, accord­ing to Prince­ton Uni­ver­sity and Uni­ver­sity of Ari­zona research that sug­gests society’s rules against self­ish­ness are rooted in the very exploita­tion they condemn.

The report in the jour­nal Evo­lu­tion pro­poses that altru­ism — society’s pro­tec­tion of resources and the col­lec­tive good by pun­ish­ing “cheaters” — did not develop as a reac­tion to avarice. Instead, com­mu­nal dis­avowal of greed orig­i­nated when com­pet­ing self­ish indi­vid­u­als sought to con­trol and can­cel out one another. Over time, the direct efforts of the dom­i­nant fat cats to con­tain a few com­peti­tors evolved into a community-wide desire to guard its own well-being.

The study authors pro­pose that a sys­tem of greed dom­i­nat­ing greed was sim­ply eas­ier for our human ances­tors to man­age. In this way, the work chal­lenges dom­i­nant the­o­ries that self­ish and altru­is­tic social arrange­ments formed inde­pen­dently — instead the two struc­tures stand as evo­lu­tion­ary phases of group inter­ac­tion, the researchers write.

Sec­ond author Andrew Gallup, a for­mer Prince­ton post­doc­toral researcher in ecol­ogy and evo­lu­tion­ary biol­ogy now a vis­it­ing assis­tant pro­fes­sor of psy­chol­ogy at Bard Col­lege, worked with first author Omar Eldakar, a for­mer Ari­zona post­doc­toral fel­low now a vis­it­ing assis­tant pro­fes­sor of biol­ogy at Ober­lin Col­lege, and William Driscoll, an ecol­ogy and evo­lu­tion­ary biol­ogy doc­toral stu­dent at Arizona.

To test their hypoth­e­sis, the researchers con­structed a sim­u­la­tion model that gauged how a com­mu­nity with­stands a sys­tem built on altru­is­tic pun­ish­ment, or selfish-on-selfish pun­ish­ment. The authors found that altru­ism demands a lot of ini­tial expen­di­ture for the group — in terms of com­mu­nal time, resources and risk of reprisal from the pun­ished — as well as advanced lev­els of cog­ni­tion and cooperation.

On the other hand, a con­struct in which a few prof­li­gate play­ers keep like-minded indi­vid­u­als in check involves only those mem­bers of the com­mu­nity — every­one else can pas­sively enjoy the ben­e­fits of fewer peo­ple tak­ing more than their share. At the same time, the reign­ing indi­vid­u­als enjoy uncon­tested spoils and, in some cases, reverence.

Social orders main­tained by those who bend the rules play out in nature and human his­tory, the authors note: Tree wasps that police hives to make sure that no mem­ber other than the queen lays eggs will often lay illicit eggs them­selves. Can­cer cells will pre­vent other tumors from form­ing. Medieval knights would pil­lage the same civil­ians they read­ily defended from invaders, while neigh­bor­hoods ruled by the Ital­ian Mafia tra­di­tion­ally had the low­est lev­els of crime.

What comes from these arrange­ments, the researchers con­clude, is a sense of order and equal­ity that the group even­tu­ally takes upon itself to enforce, thus giv­ing rise to altruism.

Read the abstract.

Eldakar, O. T., Gallup, A. C. and Driscoll, W. W. (2013), When Hawks Give Rise To Doves: The Evo­lu­tion and Tran­si­tion of Enforce­ment Strate­gies. Evo­lu­tion. doi: 10.1111/evo.12031

This work was sup­ported by the National Insti­tutes of Health.

Cancer cells exchange leaders during invasion (PNAS)

By Cather­ine Zan­donella, Office of the Dean for Research

A new study has found that can­cer cells appear to exchange lead­ing roles as they migrate out of a tumor in the early stages of inva­sion, or metas­ta­sis, of other sites in the body. Metasta­tic can­cer accounts for more than 90% of cancer-related deaths.

A team led by Robert Austin, pro­fes­sor of physics at Prince­ton Uni­ver­sity, found that indi­vid­ual can­cer cells take turns as trail­blaz­ers when they carve their way through the dense wall — known as the extra­cel­lu­lar matrix — that stands between a tumor and the blood ves­sels which can carry the cells to other parts of the body.

The researchers also found that the cells leave the tumor in search of food, since cells that had plenty of avail­able nutri­ents did not migrate. The find­ing rein­forces the hypoth­e­sis that metas­ta­sis occurs when tumors become so densely packed that blood ves­sels can­not pen­e­trate the inte­rior and can­cer cells must migrate to survive.

The researchers included first author Liyu Liu of the Chi­nese Acad­emy of Sci­ences; Guil­laume Duc­los of the National Cen­ter for Sci­en­tific Research in Paris; Bo Sun, Jeongseog Lee, Amy Wu, Howard Stone and James Sturm of Prince­ton Uni­ver­sity; Yoon­seok Kam and Robert Gatenby of H. Lee Mof­fitt Can­cer Cen­ter in Tampa; and Eduardo Son­tag of Rut­gers Uni­ver­sity. The arti­cle appeared in the Pro­ceed­ings of the National Acad­emy of Sciences.

To study can­cer cell behav­ior, the researchers con­structed a small cham­ber with three com­part­ments arranged like floors in an apart­ment build­ing. On the bot­tom floor was a well of glu­cose, the pre­ferred food for metasta­tic cells. The mid­dle floor con­tained a dense layer of col­la­gen, a pro­tein that makes up the extra­cel­lu­lar matrix that sur­rounds tumors. On the top floor they placed metasta­tic can­cer cells, which were labeled with flu­o­res­cent dye for vis­i­bil­ity. They trained a micro­scope and cam­era on the chamber.

Through the micro­scope, the researchers filmed the can­cer cells as they moved down through the cham­ber toward the glu­cose. The researchers found that a sin­gle cell would become the leader for some time, then drop back as another cell took the lead in what the authors term a “col­lec­tive inva­sion strat­egy.” They also found that the col­la­gen was pushed aside, leav­ing a wake in which cells behind the leader could travel.

Because the col­la­gen is very dense, the cells must expend a lot of energy to reach the glu­cose, and indeed the researchers found that cells with­out a need for glu­cose did not bother to bur­row down into the col­la­gen. The researchers used col­la­gen with a den­sity sim­i­lar to that of human breast tissue.

The study adds to the grow­ing under­stand­ing of metas­ta­sis and could serve to assist researchers in devel­op­ing strate­gies for its prevention.

Liyu Liu, Guil­laume Duc­los, Bo Sun, Jeongseog Lee, Amy Wu, Yoon­seok Kam, Eduardo D. Son­tag, Howard A. Stone, James C. Sturm, Robert A. Gatenby, and Robert H. Austin. Min­i­miza­tion of ther­mo­dy­namic costs in can­cer cell inva­sion. PNAS Jan­u­ary 14, 2013 201221147.

Read the paper (open access).

This work was sup­ported by the National Sci­ence Foun­da­tion and the National Can­cer Institute.

Racial diversity and judicial influence (American Journal of Political Science)

By Michael Hotchkiss, Office of Communications

Adding a black judge to an appel­late panel with two non­black judges nearly ensures the panel will vote in favor of an affir­ma­tive action pro­gram, accord­ing to research by Jonathan Kastel­lec, an assis­tant pro­fes­sor of pol­i­tics at Prince­ton, who has eval­u­ated the con­se­quences of judi­cial diver­sity on the U.S. Court of Appeals.

While Kastellec’s research also shows that black judges are sig­nif­i­cantly more likely to sup­port affir­ma­tive action pro­grams, the small per­cent­age of racial minori­ties on the fed­eral bench means the key ques­tion is whether their pres­ence on appel­late courts influ­ences their col­leagues and affects case outcomes.

The results have impor­tant impli­ca­tions for assess­ing the rela­tion­ship between diver­sity and rep­re­sen­ta­tion on fed­eral courts.

Kastel­lec, J. P. (2013), Racial Diver­sity and Judi­cial Influ­ence on Appel­late Courts. Amer­i­can Jour­nal of Polit­i­cal Sci­ence, 57: 167–183. doi: 10.1111/j.1540–5907.2012.00618.x

Read the article

Downplaying positive impressions: Warmth versus competence (Journal of Experimental Social Psychology)

By Michael Hotchkiss, Office of Communications

When peo­ple want to appear warm, they tend to agree, com­pli­ment, per­form favors and encour­age oth­ers to talk. When they want to appear com­pe­tent, they empha­size their accom­plish­ments, exude con­fi­dence and con­trol the con­ver­sa­tion. But peo­ple try­ing to man­age how oth­ers see them also take advan­tage of a neg­a­tive rela­tion­ship between warmth and com­pe­tence, accord­ing to Prince­ton Uni­ver­sity researchers Deb­o­rah Son Holoien, a grad­u­ate stu­dent in psy­chol­ogy, and Susan Fiske, the Eugene Hig­gins Pro­fes­sor of Psy­chol­ogy. Four stud­ies detailed in this arti­cle found that peo­ple will act less com­pe­tent to appear warm and act less warm to appear competent.

Holoien, Deborah Son and Susan Fiske. 2013 Down­play­ing pos­i­tive impres­sions: Com­pen­sa­tion between warmth and com­pe­tence in impres­sion man­age­ment. Jour­nal of Exper­i­men­tal Social Psy­chol­ogy 49: 33–41.

Read the abstract

This work was sup­ported by a National Sci­ence Foun­da­tion Grad­u­ate Research Fellowship.

Nursing gerbils unravel benefit of multiple mothers in collective mammals (Mammalian Biology)

By Mor­gan Kelly, Office of Communications

In mam­mals such as rodents that raise their young as a group, infants will nurse from their mother as well as other females, a dynamic known as allo­suck­ling. Ecol­o­gists have long hypoth­e­sized that allo­suck­ling lets new­borns stock­pile anti­bod­ies to var­i­ous dis­eases, but the exper­i­men­tal proof has been lack­ing until now.

An in-press report in the jour­nal Mam­malian Biol­ogy found that infant Mon­go­lian ger­bils that suck­led from females given sep­a­rate vac­cines for two dif­fer­ent dis­eases wound up with anti­bod­ies for both illnesses.

The find­ings not only demon­strate the poten­tial pur­pose of allo­suck­ling, but also pro­vide the first frame­work for fur­ther study­ing it in the wild by using trace­able anti­bod­ies, said first author Romain Gar­nier, a post­doc­toral researcher in Prince­ton University’s Depart­ment of Ecol­ogy and Evo­lu­tion­ary Biol­ogy. Gar­nier con­ducted the research with Syl­vain Gan­don and Thierry Boulin­ier of the Cen­ter for Func­tional and Evo­lu­tion­ary Ecol­ogy in France, and with Yan­nick Chaval and Nathalie Char­bon­nel at the Cen­ter for Biol­ogy and Man­age­ment of Pop­u­la­tions in France.

Gar­nier and his coau­thors admin­is­tered an influenza vac­cine to one group of female ger­bils, and a vac­cine for Bor­re­lia burgdor­feri — the bac­te­r­ial agent of Lyme dis­ease — to another group. Once impreg­nated, female ger­bils from each vac­cine group were paired and, as the ger­bils do in nature, kept sep­a­rate from the male ger­bils to birth and rear their young. In the wild, females can choose which young to nurse and infant ger­bils can like­wise choose which female to suckle. In the typ­i­cal lab, how­ever, one male, one female and their young are housed together, the researchers wrote.

When screened upon birth, all the infant ger­bils had no detectable anti­bod­ies against influenza while one had anti­bod­ies against B. burgdor­feri, accord­ing to the paper. But after eight days of nurs­ing, all the infants con­tained high lev­els of anti­bod­ies for both influenza and B. burgdor­feri, sug­gest­ing that the females nursed the young — their own and those of the other female — evenly. These results sug­gest that allo­suck­ling is indeed intended to expose new­born ani­mals to a host of antibodies.

This ben­e­fit sheds light on a pecu­liar arrange­ment in coop­er­a­tive mam­mals that ecol­o­gists have puz­zled over, the authors wrote. In social species, females usu­ally fall into dom­i­nant or sub­or­di­nate groups with the sub­or­di­nate females typ­i­cally involved in tend­ing to the young pro­duced by dom­i­nant females. Yet, in many cases, sub­or­di­nate females are “allowed” to breed. Gar­nier and his col­leagues sug­gest that the poten­tially larger anti­body pool avail­able through nurs­ing might be one of the rea­sons why.

Cita­tion: Gar­nier, R., et al., Evi­dence of cross-transfer of mater­nal anti­bod­ies through allo­suck­ling in a mam­mal: Poten­tial impor­tance for behav­ioral ecol­ogy. Mam­mal. Biol. (2012).

Read the abstract.