Tag Archives: chemistry

Serendipity Pays Off (Science)

By Cather­ine Zan­donella, Office of the Dean for Research

Serendip­ity –­­ the act of find­ing some­thing good or use­ful while not specif­i­cally search­ing for it – can some­times pay off. Now Prince­ton Uni­ver­sity chem­istry researchers report that this non-specific type of search­ing has yielded a new method of build­ing mol­e­cules for use in new drugs, new agri­cul­tural chem­i­cals and even new perfumes.

In a paper pub­lished today in the jour­nal Sci­ence, Princeton’s David MacMil­lan and his team describe the dis­cov­ery of a new chem­i­cal reac­tion – not noted before in nature or in any lab – that could assist phar­ma­ceu­ti­cal chemists and oth­ers who rou­tinely cre­ate new chem­i­cals for a vari­ety of industries.

Until now, no one real­ized this chem­i­cal reac­tion – which involves adding atoms to a spe­cific car­bon atom on a mol­e­cule – could occur, accord­ing to MacMil­lan, the James S. McDon­nell Dis­tin­guished Uni­ver­sity Pro­fes­sor of Chem­istry at Prince­ton. “If you show this chem­i­cal reac­tion to most chemists, they imme­di­ately say ‘that’s impos­si­ble,’” MacMil­lan said.

In this case, the team dis­cov­ered this “impos­si­ble” reac­tion using an approach MacMil­lan pio­neered that he calls “accel­er­ated serendip­ity.” The researchers use robotic arms to con­duct thou­sands of reac­tions per day by com­bin­ing in test tubes dif­fer­ent com­bi­na­tions of chem­i­cals along with cat­a­lysts that spur the reac­tions. When the inves­ti­ga­tors find a reac­tion that makes an inter­est­ing prod­uct, they study it to under­stand how the reac­tion occurs.

We didn’t invent this new reac­tion – nature did that,” MacMil­lan said, “but we fig­ured out how to get the reac­tion to hap­pen in the lab.” said MacMil­lan. His team, which included grad­u­ate stu­dent Michael Pirnot, post­doc­toral researcher David Mar­tin and for­mer post­doc­toral researcher Dan­ica Ran­kic, uses ordi­nary light bulbs as cat­a­lysts, a tech­nique devel­oped in MacMillan’s lab and pub­lished in Sci­ence in 2008, to spur the reactions.

Going for­ward, chemists can add this new reac­tion to their tool box of meth­ods for build­ing up mol­e­cules, which they do in a way anal­o­gous to join­ing together pieces of Kinex or Tin­ker Toys, by swap­ping in new parts to increase the func­tion of the mol­e­cule. In the new reac­tion pub­lished today, the team dis­cov­ered a way to join so-called “func­tional groups” to a spe­cific car­bon atom (see dia­gram) in larger struc­tures known as ketones and alde­hy­des. The abil­ity to add func­tional groups to that car­bon atom was thought impos­si­ble until now.

macmillan

Cap­tion: Upper and lower left: Green spots indi­cate car­bon atoms known to undergo reac­tions. Right panel: Pur­ple spot indi­cates a car­bon atom thought not to undergo reac­tions. The team dis­cov­ered, using accel­er­ated serendip­ity, a way to cause this car­bon to react, result­ing in addi­tion of func­tional groups, and poten­tially lead­ing to new drugs or other impor­tant indus­trial chem­i­cals. (Source: Science)

This new chem­i­cal reac­tion has wide appli­ca­tions, MacMil­lan said. “This is a fun­da­men­tal reac­tion which any chemist can start using.”

For exam­ple, a chemist who is build­ing a drug to treat Alzheimer’s dis­ease might desire to add a chem­i­cal group to the reluc­tant car­bon atom. Nor­mally that would require the chemist to con­duct sev­eral dif­fer­ent chem­i­cal reac­tions over sev­eral weeks, but with the new reac­tion the chemist could build the drug in two days and be test­ing drug can­di­dates much more quickly.

Sim­i­larly a chemist at a fra­grance com­pany could use the new reac­tion to exper­i­ment with the cre­ation of new per­fume formulations.

MacMillan’s orig­i­nal paper on accel­er­ated serendip­ity, pub­lished in 2011 in Sci­ence, suc­cess­fully dis­cov­ered a reac­tion now used in the drug indus­try. Yet it was con­tro­ver­sial because other sci­en­tists inter­preted the robotic searches as ran­dom searches, when in fact they were not ran­dom. “We chose chem­i­cals that had never been shown to react with each other – those are the ones we believe might lead to as-yet undis­cov­ered reac­tions.” MacMil­lan said that these reac­tions may have been cre­ated in the past by chemists who didn’t rec­og­nize what they were.

Read the abstract.

Michael T. Pirnot, Dan­ica A. Ran­kic, David B. C. Mar­tin, David W. C. MacMil­lan. Pho­tore­dox Acti­va­tion for the Direct β-Ary­la­tion of Ketones and Alde­hy­des. Sci­ence 29 March 2013. Vol. 339 no. 6127 pp. 1593–1596.

This research was sup­ported by the National Insti­tute of Gen­eral Med­ical Sci­ences grant R01 GM103558-01 and gifts from Merck, Amgen, Abbott, and Bristol-Myers Squibb.