Tag Archives: neuroscience

Researchers discover workings of brain’s ‘GPS system’ (Nature)

By Cather­ine Zan­donella, Office of the Dean for Research

Just as a global posi­tion­ing sys­tem (GPS) helps find your loca­tion, the brain has an inter­nal sys­tem for help­ing deter­mine the body’s loca­tion as it moves through its surroundings.

A new study from researchers at Prince­ton Uni­ver­sity pro­vides evi­dence for how the brain per­forms this feat. The study, pub­lished in the jour­nal Nature, indi­cates that cer­tain position-tracking neu­rons — called grid cells — ramp their activ­ity up and down by work­ing together in a col­lec­tive way to deter­mine loca­tion, rather than each cell act­ing on its own as was pro­posed by a com­pet­ing theory.

Grid cells are neu­rons that become elec­tri­cally active, or “fire,” as ani­mals travel in an envi­ron­ment. First dis­cov­ered in the mid-2000s, each cell fires when the body moves to spe­cific loca­tions, for exam­ple in a room. Amaz­ingly, these loca­tions are arranged in a hexag­o­nal pat­tern like spaces on a Chi­nese checker board.  (See figure.)

Tank_Brain_GPS

As the mouse moves around in a square arena (left), a sin­gle grid cell in the mouse’s brain becomes active, or spikes, when the ani­mal arrives at par­tic­u­lar loca­tions in the arena (right). These loca­tions are arranged in a hexag­o­nal pat­tern. The red dots indi­cate the mouse’s loca­tion in the arena when the grid cell fired. (Image credit: Cristina Dom­nisoru, Prince­ton University)

Together, the grid cells form a rep­re­sen­ta­tion of space,” said David Tank, Princeton’s Henry L. Hill­man Pro­fes­sor in Mol­e­c­u­lar Biol­ogy and leader of the study. “Our research focused on the mech­a­nisms at work in the neural sys­tem that forms these hexag­o­nal pat­terns,” he said. The first author on the paper was grad­u­ate stu­dent Cristina Dom­nisoru, who con­ducted the exper­i­ments together with post­doc­toral researcher Amina Kinkhabwala.

Dom­nisoru mea­sured the elec­tri­cal sig­nals inside indi­vid­ual grid cells in mouse brains while the ani­mals tra­versed a computer-generated vir­tual envi­ron­ment, devel­oped pre­vi­ously in the Tank lab. The ani­mals moved on a mouse-sized tread­mill while watch­ing a video screen in a set-up that is sim­i­lar to video-game vir­tual real­ity sys­tems used by humans.

She found that the cell’s elec­tri­cal activ­ity, mea­sured as the dif­fer­ence in volt­age between the inside and out­side of the cell, started low and then ramped up, grow­ing larger as the mouse reached each point on the hexag­o­nal grid and then falling off as the mouse moved away from that point.

This ramp­ing pat­tern cor­re­sponded with a pro­posed mech­a­nism of neural com­pu­ta­tion called an attrac­tor net­work. The brain is made up of vast num­bers of neu­rons con­nected together into net­works, and the attrac­tor net­work is a the­o­ret­i­cal model of how pat­terns of con­nected neu­rons can give rise to brain activ­ity by col­lec­tively work­ing together. The attrac­tor net­work the­ory was first pro­posed 30 years ago by John Hop­field, Princeton’s Howard A. Prior Pro­fes­sor in the Life Sci­ences, Emeritus.

The team found that their mea­sure­ments of grid cell activ­ity cor­re­sponded with the attrac­tor net­work model but not a com­pet­ing the­ory, the oscil­la­tory inter­fer­ence model. This com­pet­ing the­ory pro­posed that grid cells use rhyth­mic activ­ity pat­terns, or oscil­la­tions, which can be thought of as many fast clocks tick­ing in syn­chrony, to cal­cu­late where ani­mals are located. Although the Prince­ton  researchers detected rhyth­mic activ­ity inside most neu­rons, the activ­ity pat­terns did not appear to par­tic­i­pate in posi­tion calculations.

Read the abstract.

Domnisoru, Cristina, Amina A. Kinkhab­wala & David W. Tank. 2013. Mem­brane poten­tial dynam­ics of grid cells. Nature. doi:10.1038/nature11973. Pub­lished online Feb. 10, 2013.

This work was sup­ported by the National Insti­tute of Neu­ro­log­i­cal Dis­or­ders and Stroke under award num­bers 5RC1NS068148-02 and 1R37NS081242-01, the National Insti­tute of Men­tal Health under award num­ber 5R01MH083686-04, a National Insti­tutes of Health Post­doc­toral Fel­low­ship grant F32NS070514-01A1 (A.A.K.), and a National Sci­ence Foun­da­tion Grad­u­ate Research Fel­low­ship (C.D.).

 

 

How our brains keep track of where we are in the world (Journal of Neuroscience)

Libraries, super­mar­kets, classrooms…the world is full of places that look very sim­i­lar, and yet our brains always seem to keep track of where we are. In a new study pub­lished in the Jour­nal of Neu­ro­science, researchers at Prince­ton Uni­ver­sity and Ohio State Uni­ver­sity have uncov­ered one way in which the brain does this.

Similar-looking places can be dis­tin­guished from each other because of dif­fer­ences in what we expe­ri­ence when nav­i­gat­ing to them. As we head toward a des­ti­na­tion, our brains cat­a­logue details such as other nearby build­ings, the look of the door­way, even the peo­ple nearby.

The researchers dis­cov­ered that the parahip­pocam­pal cor­tex, a part of the visual sys­tem that ana­lyzes the cur­rent scene in front of us, also incor­po­rates the details lead­ing up to the scene, or its “tem­po­ral con­text.” As a result, even when two scenes look iden­ti­cal, we cre­ate dif­fer­ent mem­ory traces for them when their tem­po­ral con­texts are dif­fer­ent. Ulti­mately, this can help our brains to keep track of where we are in the world.

Learn more about Nicholas Turk-Browne’s research at Prince­ton University.

Jour­nal Cita­tion: Turk-Browne NB, Simon MG, Seder­berg PB. Scene rep­re­sen­ta­tions in parahip­pocam­pal cor­tex depend on tem­po­ral con­text.  J Neu­rosci. 2012 May 23;32(21):7202–7.