Have Fairies Always Had Wings? The Iconography of a Magical Being

Everyone knows–or ought to–that fairies can fly.  All the thoroughly modern tooth fairies illustrated in this summer’s post about “Rewriting the Tooth Fairy’s Job Description,” no matter what they were wearing, had wings.  These magical beings may not have acquired this essential power until relatively late in their history.

Unfortunately, fairies frequently disguise themselves when they need to test mortals.  In Perrault’s “La fee”–often known in English as “Diamonds and Toads”–the cruel stepmother sends her detested stepdaughter to the well to draw water for the family.  The kind girl stops to give a poor old woman (a fairy transformed beyond recognition) a drink before hurrying back home with the the full pitcher. The illustration does not blow the fairy’s cover then or at the end of the story, so the reader has no idea what she really looks like.  Maybe she has wings, maybe she doesn’t…

f

My guess is that she probably didn’t.  Here is one of the earliest pictures I have ever seen of fairies in the wood cut frontispiece to a selection of original fairy tales by Mme. d’Aulnoy published by Ebenezer Tracy in 1716, just a few years after they were first translated into English.  (Cotsen 25203).   A group of tiny fairies are dancing in a ring before their king and queen, who are, rather incongruously, the size of human beings (the bird and insect in the upper left and right also were not drawn to the expected scale). The dancers are wearing brimmed hats with steeple crowns, the kind that Mother Goose and witches wear, but they have no wings.

The book was owned by a George Jones who wrote his name in the back of the book.  George tried to copy a portion of the frontispiece on its blank side.  He, or whoever the artist was, had some trouble drawing the fairies, but they don’t any wings.

Cotsen 25203.

William Blake, who claimed to have seen a fairy funeral, ought to be a reliable source. The Tate holds a charming  drawing ca. 1786 of the fairies dancing in a ring before their  king Oberon and his queen Titania, in which everyone is wingless. 

A little over ten years later, the French illustrator of  Perrault’s “Peau d’ane” in an edition of 1798.  The girl with the donkey’s skin thrown over the blue dress must be the heroine, so the fairy has to be the lady in the rose gown with the billowing yellow scarf descending in a cloud.  No wings necessary seems a reasonable explanation.

But in forty years, there has been a major change in the representation of the appearance and attributes of fairies.  The fairy Cri-Cri shown in the frontispiece of  Fairy Tales, Consisting of Seven Delightful Stories (London: T. Hughes, 1829;  Cotsen 33142) has gauzy pink wings and an accessory that is clearly some kind of wand.

It is impossible to mistake the fairy in the Walter Crane illustration below.  Her blue chiton harmonizes perfectly with her gorgeous (and very prominent) wings.

Lucy Crane, The Baby’s Bouquet: A Fresh Bunch of Old Rhymes and Tunes. Illustrated by Walter Crane. London: George Routledge & Sons 1878 (Cotsen 21153).

Why did the appearance of fairies change so dramatically?  I strongly suspect it was the  influence of the popular theater in London, but it will take an enterprising enterprising scholar to establish a more precise history of fairy wings…

Playing with Propaganda I: Paper Models from the Spanish Civil War 1936-1939

Wartime doesn’t necessarily bring to a halt the manufacturing of amusements for children: it may encourage production of attractive but relatively inexpensive things to draw them into the effort.  During the Spanish Civil War (1936-1939), Costales Gomez in Granada  published “Instrumentos de Guerra” [Instruments of War], a set of 12 sheets measuring 23 x 32 cm. to cut, fold, assemble, and display.  The much slicker cut-and-fold construction sheets designed by the French firm, Imagerie d’Epinal were its predecessors.  “J. Gálvez” is credited on every sheet, but I wasn’t able to find out anything more about the illustrator.  It’s unclear if the set was commissioned by the communists or the fascists.

Cotsen has acquired six of the 12 sheets in “Instrumentos de Guerra.”  “Thumb Dog,” a vintage paper modeler, wrote a detailed account of his experience building them.  He said he felt like the Alpha tester because he “couldn’t imagine the designer ever built one of his own works.  Poorly measured parts, tabs where they shouldn’t be, no tabs where they should be, bad color matchup.”  “Thumb Dog,” who is also  an avid amateur military historian, also critiqued the accuracy of the models in the running commentary about the Spanish defense infrastructure during the conflict.

How many sets were printed?  How were they distributed?  How many were purchased?  And perhaps the all-important question, how many were actually made?  How many children made a connection between the pastime and the war they were living through?  Have any memories of playing with this kind of propaganda survive?

Here is a list of all the models in the series “Instrumentos de Guerra” copied with thanks from Thumb Dog’s thread on The Paper Modelers website.

Tanque [Tank] (1)

Acorazado [i.e. Battleship] (2)Zeppelin (3)

Trimotor (4)

Carros Blindados [i.e. Armored Car]  (5)

Amulancio sanitaria [Ambulance] (6)Auto-Oruga Transportes de artilleria [Half Tank Truck] (7)

Emisora de Campana [Campaign Radio] (8)

Fighter (9)

Submarino [Submarine] (10)Aeródromo [Airport] (11)Coastal Gun (12)