Topology

Topol­ogy, in broad terms, is the study of those qual­i­ties of an object that are invari­ant under cer­tain defor­ma­tions. Such defor­ma­tions include stretch­ing but not tear­ing or glu­ing; in laymen’s terms, one is allowed to play with a piece of paper clay with­out pok­ing holes in it or join­ing two sep­a­rate parts together. (A pop­u­lar joke is that for topol­o­gists, a dough­nut and a cof­fee mug are the same thing, because one can be con­tin­u­ously deformed into the other.)

A topol­ogy on an object is a struc­ture that deter­mines which sub­sets of the object are open sets; such a struc­ture is what gives the object prop­er­ties such as com­pact­ness, con­nect­ed­ness, or even con­ver­gence of sequences. For exam­ple, when we say that [0, 1] is com­pact, what we really mean is that with the usual topol­ogy on the real line R, the sub­set [0, 1] is com­pact. We could eas­ily give R a dif­fer­ent topol­ogy (e.g., the lower limit topol­ogy), such that the sub­set [0, 1] is no longer com­pact. Point-set topol­ogy is the sub­field of topol­ogy that is con­cerned with con­struct­ing topolo­gies on objects and devel­op­ing use­ful notions such as sep­a­ra­bil­ity and count­abil­ity; it is closely related to set theory.

There are other sub­fields of topol­ogy. One sub­field is alge­braic topol­ogy, which uses alge­braic tools (i.e., groups, rings, etc.) to rig­or­ously express intu­itions such as “holes”. For exam­ple, how is a hol­low sphere dif­fer­ent from a hol­low dough­nut (known also as a torus)? One may say that the torus has a “hole” in it while the sphere does not. This intu­ition is cap­tured by the notion of the fun­da­men­tal group, which, (very) loosely speak­ing, is an alge­braic object that counts the num­ber of “holes” of a topo­log­i­cal space. There are other use­ful alge­braic tools, includ­ing var­i­ous homol­ogy and coho­mol­ogy the­o­ries. These can all be viewed as a map­ping from the cat­e­gory of topo­log­i­cal spaces to alge­braic objects, and are very good exam­ples of func­tors in the lan­guage of cat­e­gory the­ory; it is for this rea­son that many alge­braic topol­o­gists are also inter­ested in cat­e­gory theory.

Another sub­field is geo­met­ric topol­ogy, which is the study of man­i­folds, spaces that are locally Euclid­ean. For exam­ple, hol­low spheres and tori are 2-dimensional man­i­folds (or, sim­ply, 2-manifolds). Because of this Euclid­ean fea­ture, very often (although unfor­tu­nately not always), a dif­fer­en­tiable struc­ture can be put on man­i­folds, and geom­e­try (which is the study of local prop­er­ties) can be used as a tool to study their topol­ogy (which is the study of global prop­er­ties). A very famous exam­ple in this field is the Poin­caré con­jec­ture, which was proven using (advanced) geo­met­ric notions such as Ricci flows. Of course, alge­braic tools are still use­ful for these spaces.

The study of 1– and 2-manifolds is arguably com­plete – as an exer­cise, you can prob­a­bly eas­ily list all 1-manifolds with­out much prior knowledge—and inex­plic­a­bly, much about man­i­folds of dimen­sion greater than 4 is known. How­ever, for a long time, many aspects of 3– and 4-manifolds had evaded study; thus devel­oped the sub­field of low-dimensional topol­ogy, the study of man­i­folds of dimen­sion 4 or below. This is an active area of research, and in recent years has been found to be closely related to quan­tum field the­ory in physics.

Topol­ogy Courses [Show]

Out­look and Advice [Show]

Con­tacts [Show]

Leave a Reply